User talk:Mrkoco77
Final warning: personal attacks/bad faith editing
[edit]Looking over your edits, not only have you been engaged in an edit war at Death of Kenneka Jenkins, but you have also been aggressively mislabeling the edits of any editor who reverts you as vandalism. This can be viewed as a personal attack.
I strongly suggest you engage in constructive, collaborative discussion at Talk:Death of Kenneka Jenkins or the talk page of any other article you are attempting to edit. Any further edit warring at Death of Kenneka Jenkins—and you have previously acknowledged warnings for your edits there—or any bad-faith description of other editors' edits as vandalism, is likely to result in your account being blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 13:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- The user Molikog check his history too he goes about wikipedia deleting content without adding zero input. it is a pattern that needs to be syopped. His edits lack decorum and constructive arguments Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please provide a specific example. In the Jenkins article, their edit summaries seemed to be descriptive and representative of the edits. —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- He argues that there are not citations in my edits which is a blatant lie! There are also sections in the contested Wikipedia article that clearly lack citations but he is clearly fixated with my edits that have one! This also translates as personal attack so please be fair in your evaluation of the situation Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- There were sections of your article that were unsourced. The only questionable conduct I see is all the way down in this edit summary, with the accusation that your text was written by an AI. —C.Fred (talk) 13:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Okay so how about that? That is clearly a personal attack he started first. And there are other sections of the article that are unsourced but not made by me but he let them be. If you check the edit history you will see user Dimadick made several edits but because he didn't have an issue with my edits the user Molikog overhauled and undid that users edit. He is playing King, Judge and Jury.
- So please kindly be fair is your evaluation is all I ask. Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- He comes on my talk page posting veiled threats and even went as far as reporting me of sock puppetry an accusation that was closed and shut down by an admin.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MostLikelyNotAnEel/Archive
- This looks like cyber bullying, he his arrogating power to himself he doesn't have and making other Wikipedia editors uncomfortable. Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please can you do another revision of the Kanneka Jerkins article and Atleast retain my sourced input Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- There were sections of your article that were unsourced. The only questionable conduct I see is all the way down in this edit summary, with the accusation that your text was written by an AI. —C.Fred (talk) 13:17, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- He argues that there are not citations in my edits which is a blatant lie! There are also sections in the contested Wikipedia article that clearly lack citations but he is clearly fixated with my edits that have one! This also translates as personal attack so please be fair in your evaluation of the situation Mrkoco77 (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please provide a specific example. In the Jenkins article, their edit summaries seemed to be descriptive and representative of the edits. —C.Fred (talk) 13:10, 29 June 2025 (UTC)