Jump to content

User talk:Meno25/Archive 25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20Archive 23Archive 24Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 30

07:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Problem pages.

Khasais of Amir Al Momenin and Oyoun Akhbar Al-Ridha are being done by the same user. I've reverted whatever on Oyoun Akhbar Al-Ridha. It was copied from [29] and looked like it was run thru Google translate.

Khasais of Amir Al Momenin is not nearly as bad, but it needs help. English is definitely not the editor's first language, so they need some help. Can you help out? Bgwhite (talk) 02:26, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@Bgwhite: I made some edits to improve the articles. Thank you for notifying me. --Meno25 (talk) 02:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. It is sure nice to have you around. You have saved alot of articles. Bgwhite (talk) 05:43, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
@Bgwhite: Thank you, sir, for your kind words. You made my day. I am happy that I was helpful. --Meno25 (talk) 16:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Bot flag on frwiki

Hello,

As a bureaucrat on frwiki, I was checking the activity of the bots, and noticed that yours had been inactive for at least 6 months. Morover, the interwikis are now centralized on Wikidata. It is not reasonable that an unmonitored account keeps a bot flag, as it may be more easily hacked. Do you wish to keep the bot flag? If this is the case, please tell me so (preferably on my talk page on frwiki, otherwise on my talk page on this project). Without any answer from you, the bot flag will be removed in one month.

Thank you for your comprehension, Litlok (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. You may remove the bot flag if you wish. Interwikis are now handled on Wikidta. I will reapply for flag if I ever needed to run another task on the French Wikipedia. However, I would like to note I may use the bot to update the interwikis on the bot's userpage. I believe this won't be a problem since it will be one edit every few months and the bot will only edit in its userpage. Best wishes. --Meno25 (discuter) 10 juillet 2014 à 18:14 (CEST)
Thank you for your quick answer, I've removed the bot flag. And of course, the account may still be used to update its own userpage, as well as other pages, as long as this does not imply any huge number of edits which would appear in our RC... Litlok (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2014

Last May, James Forrester announced to the world that London had been awarded the 2014 Wikimania conference. Functioning as the Wikimedia movement's annual conference, it is separate from the chapter-focused Wikimedia Conference. The first, located in Frankfurt, took place in 2005 and had 380 attendees. London, the tenth, is now expected to attract 1500. With Wikimania ambition, attention, and attendance rising significantly over the last nine years, how have this year's monetary costs come to be?
After an extremely close race, round three is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years—321 was required in 2013, and 243 points in 2012.
The Wikimedia Education Program currently spans 60 programs around the world; students and instructors participate at almost every level of education. The Education program Signpost series presents a snapshot of the Wikimedia Global Education Program as it exists in 2014.
Five articles, six lists, and nine pictures were promoted to 'featured' status last week on the English Wikipedia.
As with the troubled release of the Wikimedia Foundation's (WMF) flagship VisualEditor project, the release of the new Media Viewer has also been met with opposition from the English Wikipedia community.
Unsurprisingly, the World Cup continued to dominate the English Wikipedia's viewing statistics. In particular, the record-breaking performance of US goalkeeper Tim Howard and the tournament-ending injury to Brazil's Neymar drove large amount of views to their articles.

07:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Chrome 1 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chrome 1. Since you had some involvement with the Chrome 1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 08:13, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

On the same day the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) announced it would offer assistance to English Wikipedia editors embroiled in a legal dispute with Yank Barry, the lawsuit has been withdrawn without prejudice at the request of Barry's legal team—but this action is being described as "strategic" so that they can refile the lawsuit with a "new, more comprehensive complaint."
This week it's still more and more World Cup, with five entries out of the top ten (and 14 out of the Top 25).
It all started in late 2005, when we first held lectures about Wikipedia in two educational institutions (universities) ...
Eight articles, three lists, and 28 pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia last week.
The Swedish Wikipedia's prolific Lsjbot, which has created a significant proportion of the site's 1.7 million articles and has nearly single-handedly pushed it to being the fourth-largest Wikipedia, was covered in the Wall Street Journal this week. The newspaper reported that the bot has created 2.7 million articles, which is apparently a reference to the Waray-Waray and Cebuano Wikipedias, where Lsjbot is also active, and that "on a good day", it creates 10,000 articles.

07:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Philips Angel

No, Philips Angel isn't a stub. It's a disambiguation page, and doesn't need to be categorised. The words "can refer to" are a clue. Please go a bit more carefully when tagging new articles with AWB. Thanks. PamD 13:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

@PamD: I see your point. The main problem is that you can't see the whole content of articles when editing using AWB but only the diff which may give you an incorrect idea about whether the page is a disambiguation page or not. --Meno25 (talk) 13:29, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
All edits you do using AWB are your responsibility. If you can't see enough of the article to see that it's a dab page, then there's clearly something wrong with the way AWB is showing you the article - I can see the whole article in the display window when I use AWB. What "diff" are you talking about, I wonder? You shouldn't be editing blindly without seeing the article you're tagging. PamD 13:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
And Mistake Creek is also obviously a dab page. PamD 13:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
@PamD: I will be more careful in the future. Thank you. --Meno25 (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

These broken redirects

Please tag them as {{db-redirnone}} instead of blanking. � (talk) 13:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

OK. Will do. --Meno25 (talk) 13:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Finished tagging them all. --Meno25 (talk) 14:39, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 July 2014

"Great success" in Israel universities is leading to collaboration and editing in high schools.
Last week I predicted that the World Cup dominance on the report would be over—but I was wrong. The World Cup Final fell on the 13th of July, which was actually the first day of the week covered by this report, not the last day of the last report. Hence, five of the Top 10 this week are again World Cup related-topics.
Galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAMs) today are facing fewer barriers to uploading their content onto Wikimedia projects now that the new GLAM-Wiki Toolset Project has been launched. The tool, which is the fruit of a collaboration between Europeana and several Wikimedia chapters, relieves GLAMs from having to write their own automated scripts and gives them a standardized method of uploading large amounts of their digitized holdings.
The English Wikipedia's did you know (DYK) section has been a feature of the site's main page since February 2004. From the beginning, the section has served as a place to highlight Wikipedia's newest articles. But over the last few years, the did you know section has gotten steadily larger and more complex, and non-notable or plagiarized articles have occasionally slipped through the reviewing process, leading numerous editors to call for reforms to the system. We asked two editors to share their views.
Ten articles, five lists, and 25 pictures were promoted to featured status on the English Wikipedia last week.

08:09, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

broken redirects in user space User:Robertgreer

Thank you for the well-meaning recreation of pages in my user space. I am, however, trying to clean up these pages as I am "semi-retired" and don't want to leave behind a tangle of stale pages when I fully retire from WIkipedia. — Robert Greer (talk) 01:32, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Robertgreer: Hi. If you wish, you can tag the pages with {{db-u1}} and I will delete the pages for you. --Meno25 (talk) 08:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Thank you, it's been taken care of. — Robert Greer (talk) 01:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations

100000 Edits
Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

If you like you can add this userbox to your collection.

This user has been awarded with the 100000 Edits award.

```Buster Seven Talk 23:21, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@Buster7: Thank you. Your message is really appreciated. --Meno25 (talk) 15:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2014

In Common Knowledge: An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Dariusz Jemielniak discusses Wikipedia from the standpoint of an experienced editor and administrator who is also a university professor specializing in management and organizations. In Virtual Reality: Just Because the Internet Told You, How Do You Know It's True?, Charles Seife presents a more broadly themed work reminding us to question the reliability of information found throughout the Internet.
Kim Osman has performed a fascinating study on the three 2013 failed proposals to ban paid advocacy editing in the English language Wikipedia. Using a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach, Osman analyzed 573 posts from the three main votes on paid editing conducted in the community in November 2013.
Another hoax on the English Wikipedia was uncovered this week—not by any thorough investigation, but through the self-disclosure of an anonymous change made when the editors were in their sophomore year of college. The deliberate misinformation had been in the article for over five years with plenty of individuals noticing, but not one suspected its authenticity. This leads to one obvious question: how many more are there?
A "program of heroes" is leading the charge in Egypt.
We indeed moved far away from football this week, and further into much more serious issues of war and death. The Israel-Palestinian conflict continues to dominate the news, and the top 10, with Gaza Strip, Israel, and Hamas. The top 25 also includes Palestine and the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Death also lies behind the popularity of James Garner, the American actor who died on July 19th, Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, and deaths in 2014.
Two articles, four lists, and seven pictures attained featured status on the English Wikipedia last week.