User talk:Meio2934

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2025/May;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is Meio2934's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Orphaned non-free image File:Sophia Dashing - Still in Love live performance screenshot 2023.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sophia Dashing - Still in Love live performance screenshot 2023.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your article on Karra (singer)

I moved it to draft space, it can be found here. I did it because the subject doesn't seem to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines on musicians. The article mostly cites interviews with the artist, which aren't considered independent coverage. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 04:34, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TurboSuperA+: See below. This was a cut & paste move. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:37, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't notice that. Thanks. TurboSuperA+_(talk) 04:38, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Your draft at Draft:Karra as it stands does not meet WP:MUSICBIO. Please work on this draft and submit it via WP:AFC when ready for review. Do not try to move pages out of draft yourself until you understand our guidelines. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sophia Dashing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophia Dashing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Dashing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leyla Blue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leyla Blue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leyla Blue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:53, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Leyla Blue clearly satisfies Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) and Notability for Musicians (WP:MUSICBIO). She is an American singer-songwriter whose single “What a Shame” achieved official platinum certification in Brazil, a recognized milestone indicating major commercial success and industry acknowledgment.

She was formerly signed to Island Records, a major record label, which aligns with criterion #1 under WP:MUSICBIO.
Her coverage—including features in Document Journal—provides non-trivial, independent press attention, consistent with WP:GNG standards.
Deleting the article disregards these clear indicators of notability and Brazil-level certification, which are substantive and verifiable beyond routine PR or self-published content.

Additionally, the same editor has nominated several unrelated articles I created or edited—suggesting a pattern of targeted deletion requests (WP:HOUND). This undermines collaborative editing and content improvement. Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should be a last resort when notability is incontrovertible and edits could instead resolve any concerns. Meio2934 (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Precious Pepala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Precious Pepala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precious Pepala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:54, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – This article meets Wikipedia’s General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) and Notability for Musicians (WP:MUSICBIO). The subject has received independent, reliable coverage sufficient for inclusion under these standards. Deletion is not appropriate when notability criteria are met, and improvements can be made through editing rather than removal.

Additionally, the same editor has nominated multiple articles I’ve created or contributed to within a short timeframe, which may be considered WP:HOUND. Mass deletion requests targeting one editor's contributions are disruptive and should not determine the outcome of this discussion. Meio2934 (talk) 05:05, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neriah (singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neriah (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neriah (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:55, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I oppose this deletion nomination. Neriah meets Wikipedia's General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG) and Notability for Musicians (WP:MUSICBIO). She has received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, all articles are present in her wikipedia article and they demonstrate non-trivial, independent coverage, which is the standard for keeping biographies of musicians on Wikipedia. She does not need charted releases to meet WP:MUSICBIO; criterion #1 and WP:GNG are satisfied through reliable press coverage.

I also note that the same editor nominating this article has recently requested deletion of multiple other articles I created or contributed to, suggesting possible hounding behavior (see WP:HOUND). Mass AfD nominations targeted at a single editor's contributions, despite available sources and prior reviews, are disruptive and not in line with Wikipedia's collaborative improvement process.

If there are formatting or sourcing improvements needed, they can be addressed through normal editing, not deletion. Meio2934 (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madeline the Person for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madeline the Person is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeline the Person until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:56, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I strongly contest this deletion nomination. This article meets Wikipedia’s notability guideline for musicians (WP:MUSICBIO) and should not be deleted.

Madeline The Person was previously signed to Warner Records, one of the largest major music labels in the world. This demonstrates significant recognition in the music industry and aligns with WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1, which considers musicians who have been signed to major labels notable.

She has also received coverage from reliable, independent sources, including Billboard and other reputable music media outlets. This satisfies WP:GNG (General Notability Guideline), which states that topics are presumed notable if there is significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.

The nomination appears to overlook these facts. If there are formatting or sourcing concerns, they can be improved collaboratively rather than removing a verifiable and notable artist's article. Per WP:BEFORE, deletion should only be pursued after attempting improvements or discussing concerns on the article's talk page. Meio2934 (talk) 04:58, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No LLM

It is blatant that you used LLM to write the above replies. I therefore have the following to say:

Hello, I'm Geschichte. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Geschichte (talk) 06:48, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi I would like some clarification on what page you say i used LLM ? we are having a discussion about this right now in another session I do not use artificial intelligence Meio2934 (talk) 07:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, I see the reply, no I did not used AI to write that reply, what I did was write 1 answer and modify it to copy to the other articles I wrote that had gotten nominated for deletion that’s all since they all got nominated together I do not use AI and never will. I know it is against Wikipedia policy and as I said we were having a discussion about this. Thank you but don’t worry I do not use AI :) Meio2934 (talk) 07:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Meio2934:

I noticed that your user page has Markdown in it for some reason (the two asterisks around words, **like this**, is Markdown formatting for boldface); either you accidentally put it there without checking to make sure it is proper wikitext, or you copy-pasted it from an AI chatbot into Wikipedia, which is what I more commonly see (it is a common sign of AI usage). If it is the former, feel free to correct me and call me out; if it is the latter, please stop saying you have not used AI. It is not against policy to use AI on Wikipedia, but please be honest if you are indeed using it. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for noticing that but as I said I like using ** on my OWN user page, you will not find an article I contributed to or created using markdowns. And I do not use AI, also the use of dashes and points does not incite AI. I like how ** looks on my page and it is my way of customization. Meio2934 (talk) 14:36, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You edited the article Karra (singer) in this edit, which tripped an edit filter for Markdown-formatted text. Was this a mistake? SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:41, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it wasn’t a mistake. As repeatedly said before I sometimes use dashes, spacing, or bold for clarity while drafting articles. That’s just my personal editing style—it helps me keep sections visually separated while I work. It’s not AI formatting, just my own manual choice while typing. Meio2934 (talk) 14:57, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Markdown formatting on that article is for the word "album title". Why did you put asterisks around the word then? It's not a section separator. That same article also uses curly quotes, which are deprecated on Wikipedia and are also common in AI writing. I am still trying to assume good faith, but it's rather hard to believe what you are saying because it is contradicted by your actions in editing articles. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 15:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hear what you’re saying, but I’d like to make it clear once and once and once again, that my edits are my own work. The asterisks were just me trying to make the text look cleaner and emphasize the album title—it wasn’t me trying to use Markdown formatting like AI tools do. Same with the curly quotes, that’s just how I typed or copied them from a source. I’m still learning all the Wikipedia style rules, and I’ll happily fix anything that’s not following guidelines.

What’s frustrating is that I feel like every small thing I do whether it’s bold text, quotes, or even formatting keeps being used as ‘evidence’ against me, when I’ve said many times my writing is human. I’m here in good faith, learning and improving, and I’d appreciate if my edits were judged on the content, not assumptions about how they were made. Meio2934 (talk) 15:09, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]