User talk:Maxeto0910
Italic text--197.138.231.10 (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)--197.138.231.10 (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
|
Nomination for Deletion
[edit]United Kingdom
[edit]Hiya. I've noticed your edits on United Kingdom. There's one issue I have with that page and its under the history, in the 21st century segment: it says in the picture Boris is still PM of the country, when he isn't. I think a picture of Elizabeth II's funeral and transfer of power would be better suited for that section. Do you think it should be therefore replaced with a picture like this?
Also, agree with you about the two images under economy. 2A0A:EF40:F1E:1E01:3139:504:C3AE:4895 (talk) 00:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- The image's caption doesn't say that Boris is still PM of the UK. It just shows him signing the Brexit agreement, withdrawing the UK from the EU, which I think makes sense since this is a crucial event of the UK's history in the 21st century.
If you support my proposal about the economy section's images, it'd be best if you write that on the UK talk page so that more people see that I'm not alone with my view. Maxeto0910 (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
[edit] Your recent editing history at United States shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snowstormfigorion (talk) 17:34, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
- Simply enforcing a clearly defined guideline for which there is no ambiguity and thereofore should be no need to discuss does not meet the definition of an edit war. Maxeto0910 (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
AI software infrastructure firm
[edit]Hi Maxeto0910, I noticed that you have worked on the artificial intelligence and Nvidia pages. I have two edit requests, one for Arkady Volozh: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Arkady_Volozh#Further_suggestions, a computer software entrepreneur, and one for his newest AI infrastructure company, Nebius Group: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nebius_Group#New_draft_proposal. Nvidia recently invested in Nebius Group. Would you mind looking over these requests? I would appreciate a neutral editor's opinion here. Thanks Wikigracht (talk) 18:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC)