User talk:Lyndaship
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
The Bugle: Issue 229, May 2025
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 230, June 2025
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Danish crews on French ships in the Scheldt Squadron 1808-1813
[edit]Dear Lyndaship,
I note you are deleting my additions which are historically very relevant. Please note that the French navy had to rely heavily on Danish crews after Trafalgar! These had become available after the British bombardment of Copenhagen in 1807.
Please revert my added information therefore. The Danish crews on these ships were therefore more to the point than the French crews were.
Kind regards,
Maartenship Maartenship (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- That is certainly of value but you need to quote your source. The names of the Captains should not be included per WP:SHIPSNOTCREWS Lyndaship (talk) 15:43, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit]Hello Lyndaship. Regarding the recent revert you made to Teddy Sheean: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. UmbyUmbreon (talk) 23:48, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
My edits of citations and references relating mostly to Coast Guard subjects
[edit]Apparently I have grievously sinned in my efforts to correctly cite at least 25 articles that I have edited in the past. I would guess there are probably more out there somewhere that I have used King as a reference. I will try to use your example edits to improve my editing of citations in the future and apologize for your trouble to correct my edits. Still learning after all these years but still trying to contribute to the effort. Thank you for your many contributions to the cause. Cheers! Cuprum17 (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Don't be so hard on yourself! Firstly the policy is be bold and it's far easier to make something conform to wiki's rules than to find a missing citation. Secondly they might not have been in error when you created them as this CS category is a new one. Thirdly this category has 73000 entries so you're not alone. Keep up your good work on Coast Guard articles Lyndaship (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 231, July 2025
[edit]
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2025 (UTC)