User talk:Lufc1997

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Knut (polar bear), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Knut (polar bear) was changed by Lufc1997 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.923803 on 2011-03-19T15:57:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Knut (polar bear). Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Thomas888b (Say Hi) 16:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Thomas888b. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- DQ (t) (e) 16:06, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User talk:Thomas888b. Qwyrxian (talk) 16:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —GFOLEY FOUR— 16:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]