Jump to content

User talk:LucasKrm21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, LucasKrm21, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10474144. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.
Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LucasKrm21! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem you did what you had to do I understand, I resubmitted my article correctly citing my sources. I forgot to do that because I work for the person that wrote it. LucasKrm21 (talk) 13:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Information icon

Hello LucasKrm21. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LucasKrm21. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LucasKrm21|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Above, you said "I work for the person that wrote it". Please make the relevant declaration on your userpage. Thank you, Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Sun compass in animals, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:LucasKrm21, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LucasKrm21|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've got to stop editing at the direction of others - Wikipedia isn't a place to spam citations. MrOllie (talk) 14:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

[edit]
Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is LucasKrm21 only adding content related to their work in a wide variety of unrelated articles.. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the case I think it should be know that I am a unpaid inter, I said boss because english is not my native language I speak french, he is just my supervisor he ask me to add these pages. They are relevent and intersting to read. Pls don't take down all my hard work. LucasKrm21 (talk) 16:04, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at Wikipedia:When your boss tells you to edit Wikipedia. What he has asked you to do is improper, that is why you're getting all these warnings and why people are reverting your edits. You should follow the advice in that essay and let him know that this isn't going to work. MrOllie (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LucasKrm21&oldid=1296622575"