User talk:Licks-rocks
| This is Licks-rocks's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Arbcom notice
[edit]You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.
Thanks, Raladic (talk) 00:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Well, at least it's not an ARBPIA case. Anyway, Welcome back @Raladic, regardless of context, I am glad to see you here again. --Licks-rocks (talk) 11:34, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Closure
[edit]Hey, thank you very much for closing the discussion about EMHRM. However, I don’t think non-admin closure is appropriate for this discussion, as it is contentious (especially if it falls within a Contentious Topic), and your close is likely to be controversial.
On content, while I disagree with the weighting of arguments (which is not very surprising), I‘m mostly concerned about how you a) weighted arguments made by banned editors, and those implicitly or explicitly relying on them, and b) the specifics of their I/P coverage, which was discussed in depth but only addressed briefly in the closure. Would you consider vacating your close? FortunateSons (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Edit: I see you have already done so. I‘m not sure if
actually let me put this one back in the oven for a moment
means that you plan to re-close it yourself. If not, feel free to disregard this :) FortunateSons (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)- @FortunateSons I was thinking about it but I don't think I will, because I came to very similar conclusions that you did, specifically with regard to the sockpuppet issue mentioned at CR (which I unfortunately only noticed when I went to mark it as done), but also because I argued myself out of the conclusion I posted the microsecond I hit send. If I were to reattempt I think I would close as GUNREL now. Anyway feel free to deploy a reasonably sized trout in my general direction, because that was definitely a screw-up on my part. --Licks-rocks (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Licks-rocks, that stuff can happen, don’t worry about it; thank you very much! :) FortunateSons (talk) 21:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
NACing something no admin dared to touch for 2 months FortunateSons (talk) 21:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'll add it to my barnstar box as a reminder to stay humble! --Licks-rocks (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Now I feel bad :/ FortunateSons (talk) 22:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'll add it to my barnstar box as a reminder to stay humble! --Licks-rocks (talk) 22:01, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- @FortunateSons I was thinking about it but I don't think I will, because I came to very similar conclusions that you did, specifically with regard to the sockpuppet issue mentioned at CR (which I unfortunately only noticed when I went to mark it as done), but also because I argued myself out of the conclusion I posted the microsecond I hit send. If I were to reattempt I think I would close as GUNREL now. Anyway feel free to deploy a reasonably sized trout in my general direction, because that was definitely a screw-up on my part. --Licks-rocks (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
