User talk:Klaskowski0825

This is Klaskowski0825's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Piero (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing a single independent reliable source here?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Piero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klaskowski0825! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theroadislong,

I am a bit confused. All of the following sources that were cited in the article are independent sources:

https://issuu.com/lj719/docs/tri-c_times_magazine_spring_2019_19

https://catalog.tri-c.edu/faculty-college-leadership/english/

https://press.umich.edu/Blog/2024/03/Millions-of-Suns-Writing-Contest-Winners

https://www.aacu.org/podcasts/academicminute/2021-10-mike-piero-cuyahoga-community-college-studying-video-games-as-culture

This doesn't include the publications that were published in peer-reviewed journals that I included links for and other creative journals. None of those publications were self-published. Each one of those citations provided led directly to those journals and magazines. The Tri-C posts are not posted directly by Mike Piero and neither is the academic minute. I can happily remove the references to his website or linkedin if necessary. Klaskowski0825 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Klaskowski0825, welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Mike Piero to Articles for creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia. We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome – I hope you enjoy your time here! ~Liance^talk 18:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Piero (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read the golden rule and be clearer as to which notability standard criteria they meet, it seems to be WP:NAUTHOR rather than WP:PROF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mike Piero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 03:48, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]