User talk:Kburgin24

Welcome!

Hello, Kburgin24, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Kburgin24, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 GR Cup Series (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 GR Cup Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kburgin24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the reasons for denial I'm slighty confused, does it mean that I need to add more sources? Or just expand on the article in general? Kburgin24 (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). When you submitted you had a single source so not showing any notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you possibly watch this draft for me and give more feedback on progress?

Kburgin24 (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really my area, your going in the right direction adding more sources. Do note the notice above for the teahouse - it really is a good place to ask for advice etc that will be viewed by lots of experienced editors and admins. Also look for input from editors with interests in the area such as at Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 23:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, I'll probably expand on the article and see what else I can add, then I'll post a question on the TeaHouse, wouldn't really want to ask when I know that now there is more to add. Thanks for the feedback!

Kburgin24 (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Kburgin24! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hi! (Draft Help Request), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2025 GR Cup Series (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GMH Melbourne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thank you for your efforts in creating this article. Unfortunately, I must decline this article because in its current form, it will likely be proposed for deletion if accepted. The sources in this article do not establish notability. To establish notability, there must be multiple sources that are secondary, independent, reliable, and in depth or meet WP:NEVENT. Do such sources exist?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 GR Cup Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been struggling with finding reliable sources for this series, as it technically hasn't started yet, it starts in July. Compared to similar series such as Tyrepower V8 SuperUte Series, it also doesn't have any sources, although they already have had 1 race/weekend of racing. So I thought this one would get accepted.

It you have any sources or advice on where to find them would be great, unfortunately it just seems as though the media hasn't pick up on it.

Kburgin24 (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC) (10:00 AEST)[reply]

Correction, I said any sources, I meant many sources. Kburgin24 (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]