User talk:Kankaungmingalar

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Kankaungmingalar! Your additions to Draft:Burmesescorpiops Wunpawng have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. I have removed the copied material from the draft; please feel free to reinsert if rephrased in your own words. Thank you. Rusalkii (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to Faunitaxys it is more than acceptable to include components of journals in the article.

https://www.faunitaxys.fr/about-2/

It is by its nature freely licensed and public domain science Kankaungmingalar (talk) 16:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

can you please revert the deletion and the wikimedia image upload can be re-done? The rest of the article should be fine Kankaungmingalar (talk) 16:40, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is licensed under CC BY-NC-N, which is not compatible with Wikipedia's CC-BY-CA. We require content to reusable for any purpose, including commercial. Rusalkii (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So is it possible to revert the deletion (minus the photograph)? Kankaungmingalar (talk) 13:56, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, anything licenced under CC By-NC-N, like that source can't be on Wikipedia, because it doesn't permit commercial reuse. WP:COMPLIC has more information on that. If I'm wrong about the license could you please show me where it is? Rusalkii (talk) 16:40, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to say that I'd like to work on the draft that was previously deleted. I am talking about the draft text, not the image. Kankaungmingalar (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but the draft text is also copyrighted under a license we can't use, since what I deleted it was copied directly from the paper and unless I'm missing something the paper is under CC-BY-NC. Rusalkii (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burmesescorpiops Wunpawng (May 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The "Etymology" section is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Burmesescorpiops Wunpawng and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kankaungmingalar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoingBatty (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Burmesescorpiops wunpawng has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Burmesescorpiops wunpawng. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Burmesescorpiops wunpawng has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Burmesescorpiops wunpawng. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:21, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burmesescorpiops wunpawng has been accepted

Burmesescorpiops wunpawng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]