User talk:Kaffet i halsen

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keita Kosugi (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Keita Kosugi instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. The article has information that is not in this draft. Please compare and combine the draft and the article. You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Keita Kosugi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kaffet i halsen! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Filipino Sailors

Hi! saw you reverted the edits I made on the articles of Jesus Villareal and Cherrie Pinpin. I included them in the Category: Filipino Sailors. I would like to know the reason for the reversion? As far as my personal knowledge, and my personal relationship with the two, they would consider themselves as sailors. Bootkinero (talk) 01:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As the article Jesus Villareal is in Category:Filipino male sailors (sport), it is not needed to put the article in the category grandparent Category:Filipino sailors. Furthermore, categorisation shall be made on article info and not personal knowledge. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 09:25, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One article Ambassador categories

While there are a huge number of one article ambassador categories, every time thry get nominated for upmerge it gets supported and done. I have been trying as I come across ambassadors who are not yet in 1 article categories to place them in broader categories. There is still much work to do in this regard. So for example I placs someone in ambassadors of France, instead of Ambassadors of France to x if there are no other auch ambassadors who have article. We used to have a rule that allowed for small categories if they were part of a large scheme. It was scapprled because many large schemes were in the main very small categories. The effort to create a category is much higher than to remove it, but equally difficult it takes some effort to find more articles that fir in a category. The potential number of subcats for any one ambassadors of category is mindblowong. It is not just all existing countries, but in msny cases several countries no longer extant and there are also ambassadors to various international bodies and people who are general ambassadors for a specific issue or concern. I have seen at least one article that is literally in 10 different ambassador categories where the article is the only one in each category. That was under ambassadors of Mali, but it is quite oossibly not the only offender and may not hold yhe recird.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello! This is not how we do things on English Wikipedia. We use an article's talk page to achieve consensus. I now welcome you to comment there. Consensus is not reached through headstrong reverts and edit summaries, and I ask you not to do that again. SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]