User talk:Jodysetiawan23

160947

Makaki 209.35.160.50 (talk) 07:17, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Makati

Baba 209.35.160.50 (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jodysetiawan23

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Jodysetiawan23 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

where is the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"? Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the user page. You might want to move it to User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox as a preferred location for draft articles. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oke thanks for your help @Ritchie333 i will try it Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

after I moving it to sandbox, so now i'm just waiting until get approved by admin right ? Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mcmatter were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jodysetiawan23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:22, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Airpaz

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Airpaz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Airpaz

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Airpaz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, Jodysetiawan23. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. A page you created has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject."Before you start writing, gather a list of indisputably reliable sources that are entirely independent of the [subject] and that devote significant coverage to the [subject]. Once you have that list of high quality sources, format them into references. Referencing for beginners explains how. Now, neutrally summarize what the sources say, avoiding any promotional language. You can find much more detailed advice at Your first article." --per Cullen328" Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. It applies to any topic, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources and Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{Reflist}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems.You can ask for help at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and on IRC chat Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

This notice is information dense. Please carefully read and thoroughly understand the linked information before attempting further article creation.

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥 I only know to remove the content service is like promotional, could you give the other detail on which part of content sound promotional ? and also could you restore it? so I can editing the content depend on the wikipedia policy

Thank you! Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at Jodysetiawan23. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jodysetiawan23|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

You had no in-line references at all.

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

Your text was fact-free promo eg The founder saw great potential in flight industry that was growing at that time. As the result, they find an idea of creating flight and hotel ticket's purchasing service via online. After getting a solid idea and concept in place, they made a team to develop the company until now

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your draft will not be accepted as it stands. Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:44, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jimfbleak for your guide. Could please review my new article on here ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jodysetiawan23/sandbox

I was checked you have reviewed the article in 2018, here the new one in 2025 Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 11:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have two drafts on the go at the same time, don't do that.I've moved your sandbox version to Draft:Airpaz in place of the version that was already there. Your refs are all bare urls, apart from the history, it's still light on real facts, and the text is still promotional company speak eg leading online travel agents... comprehensive services... offers a simple flight and hotel booking process with various options... enhances travelers’ experiences with affordable prices, exclusive offers, reliable payment option.... No chance of it being accepted without formatted refs and a neutral tone. Please read the guidance above carefully. If you don't follow the advice, your article will be rejected and deleted, and you may be blocked Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn't have deleted the draft. I had it restored a week back based on request by Jodysetiawan23. It had history from 2023 and had been reviewed as well. The sandbox could have been merged into that. Jay 💬 12:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did not get a response from you. I have restored the draft you deleted. Moved the sandbox version to Draft:Airpaz (2). Jay 💬 14:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jay 💬 & Jimfbleak Yeah, I’m a bit confused. I didn’t use the old article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz since it’s outdated. Now, I’m only using https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz_(2). I want to merge them into one article. Where can I find the menu to merge? I didn’t find this feature in the sandbox version.

Alright Jimfbleak. I will revise the content and get back to you. Thanks for your guidance. Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jay 💬, you said Did not get a response from you. Where did you ping me? I don't remember a talk page message or ping from here, apologies if I missed your notification. I came here because Jodysetiawan23 pinged me Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used the "Reply" link and assumed the editor whose comment is being replied, gets the notification. I'm trying the "Reply" again. Jay 💬 11:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the Twinkle dropdown, go to Merging and select one of the options. I have done it in this case. Jay 💬 11:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimfbleak, Could you please help review and provide guidance on improving this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz? Your feedback would be greatly appreciated! Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of reviewing promo for a company with no real facts about said company, and you are still ignoring COI notices. However, Jay seems to have taken on oversight of this draft, so I'll leave it to him Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jodysetiawan23 has not ignored the COI noticies. See #January 2025 below where the editor was trying to figure out the {{paid}} tag at the draft. Jay 💬 14:34, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sory I got missunderstand about COI notices, could you review once again ? thanks Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not even going to check the sources, since the text is so unambiguously promotional that it has to be completely rewritten. If and when the draft text is rewritten, the references should also be formatted so as to give the readers information about what they are. See this guide.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 15:08, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Jodysetiawan23, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Jodysetiawan23|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 15:11, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi bonadea, I have revise the article and also I already copy this script on my draft {{paid|user=Jodysetiawan23|employer=InsertName}} that script on the bottom article. Is it ok ? Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 09:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The disclosure should be on your user page (User:Jodysetiawan23), rather than on the draft itself. I see that there is a disclosure on the draft talk page, which is good. --bonadea contributions talk 14:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bonadea, Could you give advice on which part I got wrong in my draft?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Airpaz Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:42, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the comment from when the draft was declined, one of the things you haven't yet done is to present the sources properly. There is a link to the referencing guide in the decline notice (in the section above this one). Have you also read the guidelines and policies on the kind of sources that are required? They are also linked in a previous decline notice, and it is really important that you read and understand them. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 09:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please properly declare your paid status immediately. Do not make further edits on the draft until you have done so. Failure to comply will result in your loss of editing privileges. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"our app"? Where is your WP:COI declaration?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:59, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and un°derstand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Jodysetiawan23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

From the first time I created the draft, I asked for your review, and I had already mentioned that I was paid by the company. If there is any advertising or promotional content, I am more than willing to remove it, as I am new here and trying to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. I kindly ask that you please be understanding and patient with new users like me, as I am still learning the process. I'm sorry if made a mistake breaking the rulesJodysetiawan23 (talk) 12:22, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

(Closing request by pro forma acceptance, user has been unblocked already.) DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:37, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see where you disclosed as a paid editor, but I may have missed it. Please link to where you disclosed it. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See #January 2025. Jay 💬 15:59, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak They did disclose on the draft talk page(Jodysetiawan23, you should do so on your user page once unblocked); is there a reason for the block other than UPE? 331dot (talk) 17:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

331dot Thanks for your help mention it!

Jimfbleak That's true I have mention it on here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Airpaz, Do you need me to mention it on my user page? For now, I am unable to edit my user page.Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot and Jay: It's clear that disclosure was made, but, Jodysetiawan23, you should disclose it on your talk page. I suppose NOTHERE might have been more appropriate, since the sole purpose of this account seems to be to promote Air Paz, but in the circumstances, I'll unblock Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:58, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 12:38, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

Thanks for making the disclosure here; you used a template intended for article talk pages; I placed the correct one on your user page as a courtesy. 331dot (talk) 07:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see, alright thanks ! Jodysetiawan23 (talk) 08:30, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ToThAc were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Jodysetiawan23! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Decline article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:SIRS to understand the kind of significant coverage is required to show notability. Please read and understand the content in those links, too. We have provided you these and other links several times. They are for your benefit. Continuing to ignore what's required will eventually get this draft rejected instead of declined. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Airpaz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:50, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Airpaz (June 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

qcne (talk) 10:40, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]