Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Jijijef!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)04:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is not mine. Someone brought it back to Drafts after four years. The article had previously been approved by experienced administrators.
The question is: Why has an article been moved to Drafts after four years, simply because of a personal conflict on Instagram? In an Instagram post, someone threatened to delete the article about Ali Tajdary, and later mockingly claimed, “See? I deleted it.”
Please report this to the senior administrators. If necessary, I can provide the link to that Instagram post or send a screenshot of the page via email to the higher-level admins.
The issue is that even I noticed the article was moved back to Drafts after that person publicly threatened in a post to delete Ali Tajdary’s Wikipedia page due to personal bias.
Here is the link to the Instagram post where the threat was made:
This is a very serious matter — it’s not just about the creation or deletion of an article. It involves threats and personal conflicts from another platform (Instagram) that are now affecting Wikipedia.
I’ve even addressed some of the minor issues in the article myself, but personal threats against an individual should not be allowed to result in the removal of their biography.
Please take this situation seriously and ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral and protected from external pressure. Jijijef (talk) 12:55, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What? Do you even know what are you saying? The subject was deleted by administrator due to a copyright violation two years from now. Administrators have the right to delete. No other users have the privilege to do so. Not even amonymous. You may not create this but submitted the draft. So this message has been sent to you as submitter. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)13:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I do know what I’m saying.
(In my opinion, your tone was not polite, and I think you should reconsider the way you address others.)
Administrators can review the article’s history and clearly see that I was not the original creator.
Also, how could it suddenly be considered a copyright violation exactly at the same time when individuals on another platform began making public threats to have the article removed? The timing is suspicious.
Besides, all the issues have already been resolved. I’ve updated the references, removed broken links, and added reliable sources. The article is now in good shape.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bunnypranav was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Tajdari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
