User talk:Jessica3801

This is Jessica3801's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: LegitTayUpdates (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tesleemah was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article looks like a gist about unidentified individual

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LegitTayUpdates and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tesleemah (talk) 10:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jessica3801! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tesleemah (talk) 10:45, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

331dot (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Straw Hat Goofy (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by LunaEclipse were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not use Dexerto or Screen Rant as sources for biographies, ESPECIALLY when you're covering someone's controversies. We take libel very seriously; for this reason, citing claims about a living person (primarily contentious ones) to low quality sources is strictly forbidden. A list of frequently discussed sources can be found here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Straw Hat Goofy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ ^{(CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST)} 18:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Straw Hat Goofy has been accepted

Straw Hat Goofy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 11:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Destiel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Destiel. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Destiel has been accepted

Destiel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Destiel

Great work! It's been in the back of my head for a while, very glad to see someone else take this on and do such a good job of it. (I've got a draft going for Wincest, if that's something you'd like to help work on!) Rusalkii (talk) 20:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may also be interesting in nominating a hook from the article to run in the Did you know section of the main page. Obviously not necessary, but fun! Rusalkii (talk) 20:23, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seconding the DYK idea. I'm making some tweaks to the Destiel page so that it's ready for DYK. The main thing would be figuring out a fun fact for the hook. Maybe finding a way to fit in superhell or just using the 200th episode would work. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some very fun stuff about the tumblr reactions in this source, starting pg. 121, and some good content about how it affected the SPN fandom too. - actually, let me go drop some sources on the talk page, that's a better place for it. Rusalkii (talk) 20:52, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd certainly be interested in a DYK proposal for Destiel, I created the page partially because I felt it was overdue. How long are hooks typically? I agree the superhell bit would probably be best, it's the most notable thing that happened. Also, good work on that Wincest draft. I was considering making one, but I couldn't find and RSs specifically covering that one, so good work on finding them. -Jessica3801 (talk) 23:50, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

200 characters is the max, but ideally shorter: a short sentence is best. You could browse some recent high-performing hooks at Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics/Monthly DYK pageview leaders to get an idea for the format. Rusalkii (talk) 00:04, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How about something like "...that an angel was dragged to superhell after confessing his love to another man?" -Jessica3801 (talk) 01:00, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hooks that are just in-universe are usually no approved (WP:DYKFICTION). Rusalkii (talk) 01:17, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense. Maybe "...that 2019's most popular ship on Archive of Our Own ended with one of its characters being taken to superhell?" or "...that one ship got so popular questions about it were banned from a fan convention?" -Jessica3801 (talk) 03:57, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really like the second one, but the article says that it was "because they allegedly made Ackles uncomfortable", which is not quite because it was popular.

And same with the second one: you need to make sure that everything you say is in the article, and it doesn't currently say anything about superhell, so that doesn't work currently.

Hmm. What else? The Olive Garden/Chilis thing is funny but I can't quite think of a good phrasing. Rusalkii (talk) 04:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For Olive Garden/Chilis, it could just be "...that Olive Garden and Chili's once got in a shipping war?" -Jessica3801 (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man. I dunno if that'll actually work since "shipping war" isn't something we should expect the average reader of the main page to understand, but it's great. If I were you I'd nominate it for DYK with that plus a couple more straightforward ones and see what the reviewers think (you can suggest multiple hooks, then people at DYK will choose which one they think works best). Rusalkii (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! Is there a specific place to propose or do I just go with Talk:Destiel? - Jessica3801 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYK nomination header#Instructions for nominators Rusalkii (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just submitted, thank you! -Jessica3801 (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LegitTayUpdates

Hello, Jessica3801. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LegitTayUpdates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1 Republican vs. 25 Kamala Harris Voters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1 Republican vs. 25 Kamala Harris Voters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Republican vs. 25 Kamala Harris Voters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:39, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki

Hello, Jessica3801. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Interface Interruption has been accepted

Interface Interruption, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article might be a good candidate for WP:Did You Know if you want to nominate it within the next 7 days. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! If I can think of a good hook I'll definitely submit it! -Jessica3801 (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Interface Interruption

On 23 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Interface Interruption, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 15-second commercial for a streaming service has been blamed for causing arguments and domestic violence? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Interface Interruption. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Interface Interruption), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 12:45, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,959 views (1,413.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, this was one of yours! Great job on it, very interesting article. Rusalkii (talk) 16:41, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -Jessica3801 (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Destiel

I approved the DYK, and for some reason made a list of things that might be nice to fix. They are not necessary for the DYK, but you may want to fix them anyway. --GRuban (talk) 16:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Farewell, Sarah Jane has been accepted

Farewell, Sarah Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]