User talk:Javajourney

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rip Open the Skies (album) (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rip Open the Skies (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Javajourney! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Javajourney, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Nations (album) to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

• The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
• Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
• Creating your first article
• Referencing for beginners
• Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 16:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nations (album) (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nations (album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 16:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Rip Open the Skies moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rip Open the Skies. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:49, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Remedy (The Blue One)

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Remedy (The Blue One), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remedy (The Blue One).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Rip Open the Skies

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rip Open the Skies, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rip Open the Skies.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Hope's Not Giving Up

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Hope's Not Giving Up, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hope's Not Giving Up.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The North Star (album)

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, The North Star (album), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The North Star (album).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Living Room Anthology, Vol. 1

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Living Room Anthology, Vol. 1, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living Room Anthology, Vol. 1.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Imago Amor

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Imago Amor, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imago Amor.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Scars to Prove It

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Scars to Prove It, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scars to Prove It.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bastun}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Magnify (Remedy Drive album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Magnify (Remedy Drive album), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnify (Remedy Drive album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive a live album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive a live album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive hopes not giving up.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive hopes not giving up.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive remedy the red one.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive remedy the red one.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive rip open the skies.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive rip open the skies.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive living room anthology vol. 1, album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive living room anthology vol. 1, album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Remedy drive magnify album cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remedy drive magnify album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve UP! (Forrest Frank song)

Hello, Javajourney,

Thank you for creating UP! (Forrest Frank song).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This looks great. Keep up the good work! Please remove any citations related to sites where regular people can make edits (ie Genius), and then remove my tag. The Billboard Magazine articles are solid.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsskyscrapers}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Good Day (Forrest Frank song)

Hello, Javajourney,

Thank you for creating Good Day (Forrest Frank song).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Same thing as the previous note on your other Forrest Frank page. Keep up the great work.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Trainsskyscrapers}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 17:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Forrest Frank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page God is Good (song). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories

Hi, I appreciate your contributions to the encyclopedia. Do you need help on formatting and categorizing articles? Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Everything* I know about Wikipedia editing is self-taught... so I'm sure that there are a lot of things I don't understand. If you think there are any recurrent issues that I'm making with my editing, then feel free to give me feedback.

• excluding the File Upload Wizard, and some really minor source editing. Javajourney (talk) 18:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Since you are creating a lot of album articles, the album style guide is a good resource. Thanks and happy editing. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:57, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nations (album)

Hello, Javajourney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nations (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Josiah queen the prodigal.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Josiah queen the prodigal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Transformation worship dominion.png

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Transformation worship dominion.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 22:46, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Dominion (Transformation Worship album). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Relient K discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rookie of the Year.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trillsong

Hello Javajourney,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Trillsong for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Frost 19:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:My tribe blessing offor expanded.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:My tribe blessing offor expanded.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 08:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Rib Lake-Prentice Hawks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rib Lake-Prentice Hawks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rib Lake-Prentice Hawks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Looking Up (Sidewalk Prophets album) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Looking Up (Sidewalk Prophets album). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and Does not satisfy WP:NMUSIC. Incubate in draft space until after album's release; can then be moved to mainspace if it charts or wins awards.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Benjamin William Hastings. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Grave Robber (song). Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please add the article to appropriate Wikiprojects and categories. Please also see Wikipedia:Citation overkill - there is no need to cite no less than seven sources to show a song has been released!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Advice

I hope you are enjoying creating and editing articles on Wikipedia. It can be frustrating at times, so when articles sometimes get nominated for deletion or moved to draft space, just chalk it up to learning experience. As you continue to edit, there are a few suggestions I'd like to pass along. First, per MOS:OVERLINK do not add wikilinks to common words like "album" or "song", to country/nationalities like "United States" or "Americans", or to job titles like "musician". Second, be careful on the overreliance of using streaming or retailer sites like Spotify, iTunes, Amazon, etc. as sources. And, finally, your use of {{cite web}} needs some help. You enter author names that aren't names (like CCM News and devops), add incorrect dates such as in this example:

{{Cite web |last=devops |date=2013-01-02 |title=Hot Christian Songs |url=https://www.billboard.com/charts/christian-songs/2024-04-20/ |access-date=2024-12-18 |website=Billboard |language=en-US}}

I'm not sure where the 2013-01-02 date comes from. The date of the chart is 2024-04-20, so that should be the date you use. And again, devops means nothing so shouldn't be added as the last name. On another reference, you list Michael Cusson as the author, yet it's just a chart list which don't have authors. If you have any questions or would like additional assistance, please ask me or any experienced editor. The WP:TEAHOUSE is another terrific resource. Thank you and happy editing. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

For the record, i usually use use the "automatic" setting while citing sources, because it's a lot faster... so random authors and dates being strung all over the place is probably some bug with that setting, in my defense. But thanks for notifying me about these things. Javajourney (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Using auto settings is just a tool to make things easier, but it is still the responsibility of the editor to ensure all the info being added is accurate as verified on the source page. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:55, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Looking up sidewalk prophets.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Looking up sidewalk prophets.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

The article that this file was used in ended up being moved to draft space.... So deleting the image probably would be in best interest, now that it no longer being used. Javajourney (talk) 03:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nations (album)

Hello, Javajourney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rib Lake Prentice Cross Country.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rib Lake Prentice Cross Country.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Thy Kingdom Come (Transformation Worship album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thy Kingdom Come (Transformation Worship album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thy Kingdom Come (Transformation Worship album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:08, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of UP! (Forrest Frank and Connor Price song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UP! (Forrest Frank and Connor Price song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UP! (Forrest Frank and Connor Price song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Notability requirements

Hi, Javajourney. Looking at your Talk page, it is mostly notices about deletion discussions for articles you have created. Each review, nomination, discussion and result causes a lot of work for other editors, not to mention the waste of your time when articles are deleted. Could you please read our notability requirements, such as WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV and, importantly, WP:NSONG, WP:NALBUM and WP:NMUSIC? Wikipedia is not intended to be a listing of every non-notable American Christian song or album release. Trivial mentions, reprints of press releases and listings on streaming services, etc., are not signifiers that a song or album is notable enough for inclusion here. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:07, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

I should probably stop making those. Javajourney (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

I mean... yes? :-) Some of the work you do is excellent, though - I've approved several of your articles on WP:NPP); you just need to concentrate on bands and albums that meet the notability requirements. Cheers, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Hoffland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Hoffland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Hoffland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pichpich (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transformation worship thy kingdom come.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Transformation worship thy kingdom come.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Aodhán King

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Aodhán King, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Aodhán King where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aodhán King (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aodhán King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:52, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forrest frank connor price up.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest frank connor price up.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Strings and Heart moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Strings and Heart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 12:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Template:Strings and Heart

Hi Javajourney, would you mind adding a {{db-author}} tag to the {{Strings and Heart}} template you created. With the main article now in draft and no other related articles, it really serves no purpose and it will be easier for you to request it than me nominating it for deletion. As a heads up though, navboxes like this are really unnecessary unless there are at least 3 or 4 additional related articles before creating one. WP:NENAN offers some good advice. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:03, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sidewalk Prophets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Fuller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Pastor Mike Jr.. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katy Nichole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Leonard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forrest Frank Drop!.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest Frank Drop!.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ellie Holcomb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Fuller.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brandon Lake discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jelly Roll (musician).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Yesterday is Dead

Hello Javajourney, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Yesterday is Dead, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yesterday is Dead.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Frost}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Frost 19:20, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Josiah Queen Yesterday is Dead.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Josiah Queen Yesterday is Dead.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heaven On My Mind (tobyMac and Forrest Frank song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WRH.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Formatting on articles

Hello. I tagged you in an edit summary earlier, but in case you didn't see it, I have several MOS-related concerns about your edits on articles.

• Please only add genres if they are sourced. Even if they may seem obvious to you, like somebody being hip-hop or a contemporary Christian music artist, these still need sources per WP:V and WP:EXPLICITGENRE.
• Template:Start date should not be used outside of an infobox per its documentation. It is not for formatting dates in prose, nor for use in wikitables or Template:Singles.
• Please do not use Genius as a source for who wrote or produced or song, nor any of its lyric pages for factual claims, as it is user-generated and thus fails WP:USERG.
• There's no real point in having a track listing section if a song was only released on its own as a one-track single, because there is no new information being presented that can't be found in the infobox. There's also no real need to have a total_length parameter for one song track listings in cases where they have a use, to distinguish the release of the single containing the normal version versus singles containing other versions of the song.

Thanks. Skyversay (talk) 07:39, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Samantha Ebert. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work, thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forrest Frank in 2024.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest Frank in 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Amen (Forrest Frank song)

Is this article about the song or the EP? JTtheOG (talk) 01:59, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Amen (Forrest Frank song). The article is about the song and not the extended play. However, the article does cover some information about the extended play, such as the track listing.

Javajourney (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daddy's DNA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jelly Roll (musician).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Javajourney. Thank you for your work on Michael Hughes Watson. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work, thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 02:56, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forrest Frank Drop!.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest Frank Drop!.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

May 2025: Do not attribute genres to sources that don't contain them / Do not add unsourced genres

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Child of God II, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Skyversay (talk) 07:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I understand the desire to avoid unsourced genres and non-neutral point of view, however, the genres added were sourced. Citations linked to websites which gave the album genres. The information on genres was mentioned in the article and not the infobox, which I assume you had seen, because you removed it. I had not added genres that I did not have sources to verify for.

Javajourney (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

"River House Records" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect River House Records has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 May 7 § River House Records until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:46, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Beautiful as Ever for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beautiful as Ever is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful as Ever until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 15:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of God Is Good (Forrest Frank and Caleb Gordon song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article God Is Good (Forrest Frank and Caleb Gordon song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Is Good (Forrest Frank and Caleb Gordon song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UnregisteredBiohazard (what i do • what did i do now?) 17:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Child of god deluxe.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Child of god deluxe.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Good Day (Forrest Frank song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Day (Forrest Frank song), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Day (Forrest Frank song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Good Day (Forrest Frank song)

That Billboard source appears to have been in error. I checked all the recent Country Airplay charts and none of them show any sign of Good Day being on the charts. Also, the Country Airplay charts move glacially slow, so there's no way a first-time act from outside the genre would already be at #8 after only a few weeks. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

ETA: Also, your link is paywalled so I can't read what it even says. I got the Country Airplay chart info from the weekly Billboard Country Update, which again, shows zero sign of Forrest Frank having ever charted. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

The citation that I provided (www.billboard.com/pro/forrest-frank-child-of-god-number-1-top-christian-albums-chart/) is the official Billboard website - the Billboard that publishes the Country Airplay charts. The article states this in the third paragraph:

Child of God is the 29-year-old Frank’s second Top Christian Albums appearance, following his four-track EP, God Is Good which debuted at its No. 5 high on April 27 with 4,000 units. All four of those tracks from the EP are also included on Frank’s new set. The lead single, “Good Day,” ranks at its No. 2 best on the streaming-, airplay and sales based Hot Christian Songs list in its 28th frame. It drew 2.5 million official U.S. streams in the latest tracking week and sold 1,000 downloads. Over on Country Airplay the song ranks at No. 8 with 4.5 million audience impressions (up 6%).

The statement I intend to higlight says this:

Over on Country Airplay the song ranks at No. 8 [...]

The official article from Billboard is enough to provide that the song did, in fact, enter the Country Airplay.

18:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Javajourney (talk) 18:46, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Then explain why this song is nowhere to be found on any Country Airplay chart from the past year? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I could very well use the same logic opposite your claim. If the song has not entered the Billboard Country Airplay, then why does Billboard themselves say that it does?

18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Javajourney (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I don't know, this isn't something I find worth fighting for. I have better things to do than prove the verifiability of professional articles.

18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Javajourney (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Because no professional website has ever made a typo before, right? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

I applaud your persistency. It has outlasted mine.

18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Javajourney (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beautiful as ever forrest frank powfu nextseasons.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful as ever forrest frank powfu nextseasons.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Looking Up (Sidewalk Prophets album)

Hello, Javajourney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Looking Up (Sidewalk Prophets album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forrest frank caleb gordon god is good.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forrest frank caleb gordon god is good.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Look to Windsward (song)

Hello Javajourney,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Look to Windsward (song) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

mwwv ^converse∫_edits 20:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breanna Nix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Your link

Disambig. got you too, I guess. You have had four articles deleted. I suppose you were not that excited about that.Spectacular01 (talk) 22:57, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Beg pardon?

Javajourney (talk) 02:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

You're not using correct terminology or practices.Spectacular01 (talk) 03:21, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Could you specify what you are referring to?

Also, I would like to mention one thing I've observed: when you see a disagreeable message on your talk page, you delete it rather than replying. This is unhelpful. The message I left on your talk page the other day is not one to be ignored. Many of your edits are causing more harm than good, and they are wasting the time of editors who attempt to reverse the problems you have created.

Javajourney (talk) 00:07, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I do not mind (am quite content) opening a substantial debate with you. I don't know your background in journalism and related topics and do not yet wish to disclose mine to you. Suffice it to say you are making rudimentary incontestable errors. I could point them out to you. Let's launch with the following. Your usage of the MOS is at best haphazard. Have already discussed charts and tables, how they are replete with mistakes.Spectacular01 (talk) 10:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

You may be content with "opening a substantial debate", as it seems you have already done with the user Afddiary. I do not share your wish to be contentious.

That being said, please, explain to me what errors you believe are in my doing.

And what is this that you speak of when you say you have already discussed this topic with? Which section are you in reference to?

Javajourney (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

This site is a vast project. There are so many abbreviations for guidelines. Whether it's what is covered and not, deleted or not, ignored... The format for sentences, Counting how many times something is linked / mentioned. You can see it goes on and on. I didn't mean huge massive debates, just willing to try to make the place better without spending multitudinous hours. I guess you are emphasizing art or music pages.Spectacular01 (talk) 04:12, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Frankly, I am struggling to understand what you are trying to say. This is the eighth message on this section and I still do not know what you are trying to tell me.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 04:18, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Sometimes the writing on here is not as good as in magazines and books. There's usually no reason why it shouldn't be close to or aligned with that though.Spectacular01 (talk) 09:10, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Well... yes, they aren't the same. That's probably because this is an encyclopedia, whereas magazines are not. I wouldn't say Wikipedia is worse, it's just a different style. Wikipedia is centered more around being informative, while magazines are often trying to promote, persuade, or entertain. Your point with this is...?

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 14:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

You are annoying me. Spectacular01 (talk) 05:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

You said you don't like debates, which obviously is not true. The size of a town or city is relevant. How many examples do you want of that? If you keep being disruptive I will stop you. Spectacular01 (talk) 22:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Nothing frank about anything. You are nonsensical. Spectacular01 (talk) 22:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

We're not saying Grammy Award winner three times. It's doable to change the wording. Spectacular01 (talk) 22:35, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

You made several allegations, I'll respond to each one in their separate category for clarity's sake:

1. I assure you, I am not happy with this debate. You are the one who started it, and you also seem to be continuing it effortlessly without my help, judging by how I didn't respond to any of your last four messages. I am only responding because I, along with many other Wikipedians, want this site to be as high quality as possible.
2. The size of the town is not relevant, and neither is the number of stoplights. Has this directly affected Pruitt's career? The article does not make it seem so. If you want to write about Eagleville, then you can write about it on the page Eagleville, TN. I am given the impression that Cinemaniac86 is in agreement with the fact that this is irrelevant.
3. "I will stop you" is kind of a threatening statement. Considering how you've only been a member for a month or two, and how you remove every message on your talk page (violating WP:TPO), I highly doubt that you are in any position to remove me from this site.
4. When I said, "Frankly, I am struggling to understand what you are trying to say", that is not what I meant by the word "frank". The other part of your statement here is an opinion, which is something I can't argue with.
5. For the record, the phrase "Grammy Award winner" is only stated twice. If you dislike the redundancy, then I think removing it would be better than rephrasing it. The way you rephrase it is a reduction of quality, and makes this an uncomfortably long phrase for something that is only being mentioned in passing. Similar to what is happening with the stoplight counter Pruitt's page.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 23:26, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

You highly doubt whatever you want. I am done with your nonsense. If you want to talk about the merits of something, fine. You are creating some content, I may add replete with errors sometimes. Let people show you them. Spectacular01 (talk) 23:58, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

You don't even have sources for the draft article. Spectacular01 (talk) 23:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Which draft, specifically? And if I don't have sources, then that is probably why it is still a draft.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 00:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Why do you continually think you know so much? If people want to help you, you should be fine with it. Spectacular01 (talk) 00:05, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

No offense, but this does not seem like you are trying to help me. You are threatening to enumerate my errors.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 00:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

That's not a threat. It's making a list. Are you ok? Spectacular01 (talk) 00:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Apologies, I seem to have misunderstood what you meant. Thank you for clarifying. If you are wanting to list my errors, then I wouldn't hate that. It would help with improving the articles.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 00:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I concur with @Javajourney, having dealt with @Spectacular01 before. Your belligerence is indicative of a severe attitude problem, and you've been completely incoherent at times when attempting to communicate (or perhaps averting). You lack comprehension of Wikipedia policy as well, and would be wise to heed advice and learn from the corrections us more experienced editors make, rather than be so combative with us.

And you need to watch your tone and your words in regards to threatening JavaJourney, because that combined with your talk page blanking are both issues that could accumulate for you. Let's have some civility. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 23:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

JJ is not even able to understand that the size of a place matters. People live in huge cities and in the middle of nowhere with cows and sheep for neighbors. Spectacular01 (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Stop feeling important, you two. You are two people on a project. You don't know who you are talking to. Important people are all over, GET respect. Spectacular01 (talk) 00:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a free-for-all. You cannot just add errors to purposely aggregate users.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 00:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

You are the one making this strange. Now, I will enumerate your errors if you want. Spectacular01 (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

If I were making assumptions, I will for a few minutes, oblige me that. You have maniac in your name, facetiously probably. You have talk/stalk too, again an attempt at humor. There's no rationalizing with you though. I have no clue where you come up with stuff. You create articles, I do, JJ has. There's no reason why you can't listen. Spectacular01 (talk) 00:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Cm, it is we more experienced editors, does that sound like experience to you? Spectacular01 (talk) 00:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Cinemaniac joined in 2007. If that doesn't qualify as "more experienced", then I don't know what does.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 00:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

@JavaJourney In regards to the "draft article"—Must be referring to the topic below this one, "You'll Be Alright, Kid", which that user said had no sources previously. But clearly you have worked on it since and now it has more than enough sources, thus it's back into the regular article namespace. So much for that attempt to discredit you. Also thanks, I forgot I'm almost 20 years old in Wikiyears!--Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 01:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

JJ, it is neither commonplace or right for you to put "This is a discography" or similar words on any discography articles. Spectacular01 (talk) 03:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I wouldn't say it isn't commonplace, there are many articles that specify this in the introduction. For example, the featured list MercyMe discography. It should be assumed that the reader does not have prior knowledge about the topic of discussion, so it would not be unreasonable to write "the discography of Example Person consists of nine albums, twenty-five singles..." or something like that.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 04:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

You'd be wrong. I don't really care if you think you would say that. The title has discography in it. It would be fine to not be redundant in any discography pages. Not only fine but it's wrong to do otherwise. Saying "here is the discography:" that is sufficient. Spectacular01 (talk) 04:33, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

It's been established that to say number one you use No. 1. When accompanying a noun say, pizza, you can put the words behind the noun preceded by a comma. Spectacular01 (talk) 04:56, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

With the MercyMe discography being a featured list, as I mentioned previously, if something is written there then it probably is compliant with MOS (per WP:FLCR). And this isn't exclusive to that page. The pages Abingdon Boys School discography and Birdman discography, among countless others, have this type of introduction.

It's similar with articles dedicated to people. Like how you start an article with, "Mattie Pruitt is an American singer from Eagleville, TN", instead of " She is from Eagleville". It shouldn't be assumed that a reader knows what the article is about simply because they read the titles - that's the whole point of the introduction paragraph.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 14:03, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Look, enough of this. You need to start listening. You wouldn't ever put something like Knoxville, TN because that's the wrong format. Spectacular01 (talk) 21:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I don't need to illustrate your errors by listing 15 things, knock it off. Spectacular01 (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I was putting that because this is a talk page, and not an actual article. If this were an actual article, I would have taken the time to spell out "Tennessee".

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 01:25, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

STOP. DD is the right abbreviation. Houseboat Records is right as is the other stuff. You must quit this stuff now. Spectacular01 (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Not joking, if you don't stop I will take this up the ladder. Spectacular01 (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Take a break, this is not that important. I already told you about stacking words before nouns. Spectacular01 (talk) 04:41, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

You do not listen at all. U.S. is the right abbreviation for everything but charts. I'll let US stay. Spectacular01 (talk) 05:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

If you had read my revision notices, you would see the note I added. Judging by your oblivion here, I am in the assumption that you did not.

What I had written was that the abbreviation should be "US" and not "U.S.", as per MOS:CHARTS. It is also inconsistent, considering that you leave "UK" and "NZ" as is.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 05:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Please quit it. I think if you want to improve something the talk pages would be a good option. You are using things which aren't words. Headings which don't exist anywhere. Spectacular01 (talk) 05:32, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Do you have anything else to do? Please get off Wikipedia, take a break, evaluate the things you're doing. I am weary of trying to proofread your messes.Spectacular01 (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

It seems that you're the one with nothing else to do, obsessing and leaving multiple messages throughout the day before any JavaJourney even replies to one message. (Also, by the way, it was obvious he said Eagleville, TN as shorthand here for our conversation, not as an article suggestion.) Not sure whether or not you need mental help, but you need to stop with the bullying, harassment, and acting with unwarranted self-importance. You take things too seriously. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 07:03, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Cm, you have been here way too long to try to start being a magician, illusionist, mind reader, all the rest. I really thought that JJ didn't know the format. Spectacular01 (talk) 07:13, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I am quite done with you. If you wish to change the terminology to this "song is in the key of E" then fine. Stop saying composed in the key. Spectacular01 (talk) 05:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Here is an example: wikihow.com/Determine-What-Key-a-Song-Is-In It does not say a song is composed in the key, it says written. Spectacular01 (talk) 06:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

This is the first time across our conversation that you have sourced your claims. Even so, a WikiHow article is not qualified for the Wikipedia MOS - different wikis.

The reason I write "composed" instead of "written" or "performed" is that writing is generally referencing the lyrics, whereas performances are not static. Between the three, calling it composition is much more accurate and understandable. It honestly makes a miniscule difference, so I don't know why you're being so particular about that. I'm just trying to keep consistency, because most, if not all, song articles follow that type of wording. No offense, but do you know anything about music aside from pop culture?

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 15:15, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

You are not listening, again. You are wrong about these things. Obviously I know what I am talking about. Spectacular01 (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

If you want to use these words, they are widely used. Career, education (when the information presented is about a high school, university, etc.) and you could even combine them like Early life and another term. You may not make up stuff. You are simply not listening (for weeks now). Kindly stop. Spectacular01 (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Regarding your first message:
Clearly not. Like I said, no offense. Most of the section titles are the same between most, if not all, articles on Wikipedia. Your changes to them are causing inconsistencies.

Regarding your second message:
Is this in reference to the Lecrae Discography talk page? If so, then I would request that you respond on that. Also, see the above statement, where I assure you that your changes are unprecedented and inconsistent with the entirety of Wikipedia.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 02:13, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I am not being inconsistent. You conversely are inventing words, headings, etc. You similarly use words in the wrong settings or in a way which has never been done, like ever. Stop. I said kindly stop. Now just quit. Spectacular01 (talk) 02:57, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Which words am I inventing?

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 02:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Just listen to everything I have said and you should be fine. It's exhausting and mind numbing to deal with this and you. Spectacular01 (talk) 03:00, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't help your argument if you claim I have flaws but won't point out where they are.

JavaJourney (talk | contribs) JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 03:01, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Your errors and / or flaws are so numerous it's crazy. I am glad you are on here, your articles are good. Don't ruin that by being stubborn. You're dealing with a near perfect proofreader here. Spectacular01 (talk) 03:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

With the things I write I generally attempt to comply with MOS, or what I've noticed as trending through other articles. I can give you a list of articles that agree with my claims (a deal of them, featured or good articles), or sections of MOS that verify it. Aside from a Wikihow page, you have not given me any source to believe these claims you are making - therefore being considered "unprecedented" and "inconsistent" (maybe not inconsistent with you, but inconsistent with the rest of Wikipedia). If you can find MOS pages or other articles that agree your thoughts on article style, I have no reason to not believe that you are simply coming up with these on your own. JavaJourney (talk | contribs) 03:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

What a laugh, me, inconsistent? Never, unprecedented? Not here, do you know me or something, joke. I may be off of here. Regardless, have I made a few mistakes on here, sure. That's expected, maybe one in a thousand or something. Spectacular01 (talk) 02:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

You'll Be Alright, Kid moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to You'll Be Alright, Kid. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. FULBERT (talk) 13:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)