User talk:Ilyazamani12

Welcome

Welcome!(We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Ilyazamani12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Julfa(1941) (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Julfa(1941) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilyazamani12! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Julfa(1941) (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToThAc was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please listen to other reviewers' advice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Julfa(1941) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToThAc (talk) 10:47, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Battle of Khoy (1918)

The article Battle of Khoy (1918) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced; may not meet GNG, no evidence of reliable sources existing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ToThAc (talk) 13:48, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Urmia April 1918 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Urmia April 1918. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it has no text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

The user is vandalizing Assyrian Pages, such as Battle of Ushno, Agha Petros, Battle of Charah, and more. The user is of either Kurdish or Persian descent who is attempting to involve his own people (Persians) into more conflicts, further investigation is necessary in my opinion. Etcnoel1 (talk) 15:49, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism again

The user has vandalized multiple pages yet again, especially Assyrian one. Can any admin look into this? Like ASAP? Why is nobody caring Etcnoel1 (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aliagha Shikhlinski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Restricted topics

Hi. See WP:GS/AA as several Armenia and Azerbaijan related topics are under an extended confirmed restriction. You are not allowed to edit these topics as you’re not an extended confirmed user. Vanezi (talk) 07:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After my alert on your talk, you violated the restriction again by creating this battle article mentioning Armenians as "enemies" in the opening paragraph [1]. Do you not understand that you can't most of the topics about Armenians or Azerbaijanis without being WP:XC? If you continue, I will be forced to report you. Vanezi (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They continue. @Vanezi Astghik Kajmer05 (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish, @Rosguill Hello. Could you look into this please? I'm pinging admins here if that's ok. I have left two messages on the user's talk already, no replies and they don't stop [2], [3], [4]. Vanezi (talk) 06:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contentious topics

You have recently made edits related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. This is a standard message to inform you that Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Vanezi (talk) 07:43, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kajmer05 (talk) 10:32, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. I just moved two of your articles to draftspace because many of the sources you cite don't seem to exist. Did you invent them, or was this generated by AI and didn't you check? Fram (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Churs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Churs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Churs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Khoy 1918

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Battle of Khoy 1918, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:31, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Urmia (June 1918)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Battle of Urmia (June 1918), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Urmia (April 1918) (2)

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Battle of Urmia (April 1918) (2), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating hoax articles with faked sources.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ilyazamani12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe this block is a mistake because I didn’t know the sources were fake. Please give me another chance

Decline reason:

My use of the CheckUser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ilyazamani12 (talk) 20:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|Ilyazamani12}}

Plz unblock me Ilyazamani12 (talk) 20:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilyazamani12. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]