User talk:IdaDactyl

This is IdaDactyl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pitelli (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pitelli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IdaDactyl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk) 17:23, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my article, and it’s very considerate of you to invite me! While it’s a shame that it didn’t get approved, I hope I’ll be able to learn from your suggestions and publish an improved version in the future. Thanks again and have a nice day! IdaDactyl (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:King Edward VI School, Southampton logo currently in use.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King Edward VI School, Southampton logo currently in use.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 01:07, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying me. I uploaded this image only for use on the school’s article but I see that a new version of the image has been uploaded there. As I did not plan its use on any other Wikipedia pages, I am fine with the file’s deletion. Apologies for any inconveniences I may have caused. IdaDactyl (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pitelli has been accepted

Pitelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rambley (talk) 21:24, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on this one. Haven't seen a draft make a comeback like this in a while. Some small issues mostly relating to sourcing specific claims still remain, but the village is obviously notable and those issues can be fixed quickly. Cheers. Rambley (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]