User talk:HumanxAnthro

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

User talk:HumanxAnthro/Archive 2

Your GA nomination of Making Memories (Rush song)

The article Making Memories (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Making Memories (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Making Memories (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Nature (Rush song)

The article Second Nature (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Second Nature (Rush song) and Talk:Second Nature (Rush song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Second Nature (Rush song)

The article Second Nature (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Second Nature (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Second Nature (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:26, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Didacts and Narpets

The article Didacts and Narpets you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Didacts and Narpets for comments about the article, and Talk:Didacts and Narpets/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Before and After (Rush song)

The article Before and After (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Before and After (Rush song) and Talk:Before and After (Rush song)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Before and After (Rush song)

The article Before and After (Rush song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Before and After (Rush song) for comments about the article, and Talk:Before and After (Rush song)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 July newsletter

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20 good articles and 48 did you know articles
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9 featured topic articles, two featured articles, and four good articles
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:ORDER

Hi. Please make sure edits like these conform to MOS:ORDER; the short description should go first. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 19:12, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Didacts and Narpets

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Didacts and Narpets a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into II. "Didacts and Narpets". This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 20:42, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]