User talk:HLCobb

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pen Foreman

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Duncan.Hull (talk) 14:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sadie Watson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sadie Watson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I have added lots more sources now. I hope that helps establish notability! HLCobb (talk) 20:54, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lizzie Glitheroe West (May 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zzz plant was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hello, I am declining your draft because it doesn't yet demonstrate how the subject meets our notability guidelines. That's not to say that she doesn't (or couldn't in the future), but it must be supported and verifiable in the sourcing. Right now, all of the references are either 1) primary (written by subject herself) or 2) non-independent (affiliated w/ the heritage alliance). I encourage you to review our policies on reliable sources and verifiability for notability in biographies. Thank you,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lizzie Glitheroe West and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zzz plant (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks so much for your feedback! I have now added more references to meet the notability guidance and have resubmitted. I hope this is now ok!

Best wishes,

Hannah. HLCobb (talk) 13:57, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HLCobb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zzz plant (talk) 22:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Fluck

Hello, HLCobb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hannah Fluck, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 23:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I don't have any kind of external relationship with Hannah Fluck. We are both archaeologists and we are both called Hannah (I am Hannah Cobb - you can check out my own Wikipedia page!) but we work in different areas of archaeology and have no connection. I hope this means the page can be published!

Many thanks,

Hannah. HLCobb (talk) 13:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]