User talk:Grzdacz

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Grzdacz! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Marek.69 ^talk 00:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: Brzesc Litewski i Okolice

Witam! Czy chodzi o polski czy angielski artykul? Czasu mam tak sobie, wiec jak juz to trafiles, to goroca zapraszam do poprawienia/rozbudowania samemu! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 22:03, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding non-existent templates

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Salad, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:53, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I recall visiting the page "Salad" on the Wikipedia, but I do not recall making any edits. Could it that I made some inadvertently? Or is some evil force at work impersonating me? Thanks for your advice anyway. Grzdacz (talk) 11:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Mellk (talk) 00:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Your recent editing history at Boeing 747 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 01:20, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BilCat,

Thank you for your message, it is always nice to receive even an automated one. (I assume that you exist outside an algorithm.) I had no idea that I was engaging in an "edit war", and I certainly never intended to. I just in good faith put in information taken from elsewhere in the Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Airlines_Flight_102). I hadn't realised that the Bagram crash was censored out of the Boeing 747 page. It is quite interesting, because while the accident can indeed be embarrassing for the US military, the aircraft itself apparently was not at fault. Grzdacz (talk) 12:21, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]