User talk:Goyama

Vandalism warning

Hello, I'm Srmd1136. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Digambara have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Please refrain from undoing constructive edits. Reverting without valid reason is considered disruptive behavior. Further actions may be reported. Thank you. Srmd1136 (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Greetings @Srmd1136,The content you added might be useful. However, it has already been reinforced in the content following the lead section. Additionally, those points are not absolutely necessary to describe the subject of the article. They can be added to another section of the page. The lead is meant for a short, succint, and crisp definition of the subject. My removal of that matter was not unjustified. I added WP:UNDUE in the edit summary to clearly describe why that was not crucial enough to be included in the lead. I am not reverting your changes now, but, in my view, this content is better for the body of the page and not the lead to maintain balance. See WP:BALANCE and WP:UNDUE. Goyama (talk) 02:53, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:RJShashwat per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RJShashwat. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JensonSL (SilverLocust) 02:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)