User talk:Gorlono

Tobias Madison

Allegations should not be in articles, generally. Please do not add back challenged  negative material to BLP's without obtaining consensus on talk page.-- Deepfriedokra   09:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm looking for more information on why or how a consensus was arrived at for removing information about domestic violence from the Tobias Madison article. It seems highly unusual that the information has been removed, given that there was a criminal proceeding with a plea deal, that it was reported on in publications like Artforum and Hyperallergic - one of the most highly regarded and one of the most read, and that it resulted in other established artists withdrawing participation from an Internationally recognised exhibition. Obviously an important moment in this artist's career. And given that similar information remains on similarly regarded artists, such as Jon Rafman, I find the arguments for removal unsupported.

Edits are also being aggressively monitored.

You seem to have been involved in the discussion for a time. Can you help to explain what's going on? Peas frog (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ramesh Ramakrishnan

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Ramesh Ramakrishnan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You had previously requested the restoration of the soft deletion. I draftified the restoration at Draft:Ramesh Ramakrishnan. Please address the issues raised in the AFD discussion, and submit the draft for review. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be identical to the deleted page? I researched and wrote the content from scratch. Gorlono (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please work on the draft as I indicated. Do not recreate the article in main space. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do I have to start again from scratch? Can you restore my page somewhere? I don't have a copy of the page I published. Gorlono (talk) 22:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Start from the draft. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Gorlono! The thread you created at the Teahouse, City name is different in Category, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramesh Ramakrishnan (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taabii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He won an award, might passes WP:ANYBIO but no WP:RS coverage found.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramesh Ramakrishnan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taabii (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gorlono! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taabii (talk) 11:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramesh Ramakrishnan (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramesh Ramakrishnan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rapido company logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rapido company logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]