User talk:GRocasFan2024

April 2025

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tiny Pop, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 11:05, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, so sorry. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 14:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hi GRocasFan2024! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of ITVBe several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:ITVBe, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Andreworkney (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at ITVBe. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Andreworkney (talk) 10:58, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 11:00, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at NickRewind, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’M SORRY!!!!!!!!!! I WAS ONLY TRYING TO FIX THINGS!!!!!!!!!! GRocasFan2024 (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cartoonito (American programming block). We have been extremely charitable about our warnings, and we require contributors to know what they're doing and to work with others. You have not done that and refused to work with us and follow policies. This stops now, or you will end up blocked. Nathannah • 📮 21:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that’s it! I’m done with Wikipedia! GRocasFan2024 (talk) 06:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

>:( GRocasFan2024 (talk) 06:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JUST BLOCK ME FOR EDITING IF YOU FUCKING WANT!!!!!!!!!! I DON’T FUCKING CARE!!!!!!!!!! 🖕 GRocasFan2024 (talk) 06:13, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I have made clear to you, the issue is that you need to cooperate with other editors, follow guidelines, and read through edits to make sure they are clear and correct. That's all you need to do, and nobody is attacking you. Nathannah • 📮 12:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I get it now. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wash’s messing up the pages, I was only make changes to them. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Redbox, you may be blocked from editing. Stop edit warring to remove the website defunct template. As has been explained by multiple people at Redbox and at Tiny Pop the website defunct template is to be used for this purpose. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I’ll stop. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 12:43, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just shut up and leave me alone. GRocasFan2024 (talk) 12:44, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

🖕 GRocasFan2024 (talk) 12:46, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lavalizard101. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Using the middle finger emoji towards another editor is uncivil. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:57, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of administrators' noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. MouseCursor ^{or a keyboard?} 21:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GRocasFan2024,

It would be very helpful if you came to participate in the discussion on ANI. It's much better to supply your perspective on the editing situation than to ignore that it is going on. I realize that you haven't been editing for a few hours so you are not aware of this conversation but when you do return to the platform, please weigh in on the dispute if it is still open. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! GRocasFan2024, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]