User talk:Etlevs

Welcome!

Hello, Etlevs, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I deleted that sandbox; please hear me out. First of all, it was blatantly promotional and we don't do that. Second, there was no real notability there by our standard, or decent secondary sources. Finally, such personal details shouldn't be posted on the internet. Please don't do this again, for your own safety. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:32, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, but this sandbox was written by a professional team, about Sr. Davi Santiago, can we review this edition and find a solution? Etlevs (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but please don't address me as "dude", and no, it was not written by a professional team. Not that that matters--what does matter is that the promotional aspect was only part of the problem. Drmies (talk) 15:04, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies Forgive my expression. Well, I edited a new version, eliminating everything that could be a promotion. Can you take a look? It's on my test page Etlevs (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft moved: Davi Santiago

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Davi Santiago. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bobby Cohn I am grateful for your support. I am at your disposal. I thank you in advance. Etlevs (talk) 15:52, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I do not speak Portuguese so I won't be any help in reviewing the article. Happy editing! Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Davi Santiago has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Davi Santiago. Thanks! Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 17:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sophisticatedevening I sincerely thank you for your support. I have made the edit. Please check if it is correct and make changes if necessary. Etlevs (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, thank you. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 18:12, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- Thank you, @Sophisticatedevening! Tell me, should I remove your comment from there or should I leave it? I have doubts about that. And can you tell me if it really takes 3 months to wait for publication? Etlevs (talk) 20:25, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, don't remove any comments or templates from reviews. As for the wait time, it can take a while due to the volume of submissions and reviewers' time constraints, so sometimes drafts do sit for a while before being reviewed. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 20:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! @Sophisticatedevening See if I didn't do anything wrong there, I pressed some buttons. Etlevs (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Etlevs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a puppet, dear editor. I am just a partner seeking to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith. I have become familiar with some fellow editors and was nearly finishing an article that you dedicated your time to deleting. I am deeply saddened by your false allegation against me. Please reconsider your decision and restore the article I was carefully editing about a young Brazilian mentor I came across during my research, who seemed to have notable significance. Etlevs (talk) 17:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed WP:SOCK, Technically indistinguishable. That's not to mention the blatant violations of WP:COI. Yamla (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.