User talk:Enhag92

This is Enhag92's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Hello, Enhag92, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melon Playground (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melon Playground and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Enhag92! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thats disapointing to see that my article for AfC has declined, however i will continue to edit the draft, please not that abandoned drafts may be deleted after 6 months. Enhag92 (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melon Playground (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melon Playground and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had added references to the draft, why did you decline it? Enhag92 (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See the forth bullet point in the decline notice - re Wikipedia:Independent sources. All of your sources are primary, so nothing to show the subject is notable. KylieTastic (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Please don't add your comments and especially "declines" to AIV reports. Leave this to admins. Thank you. Widr (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Enhag92 (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Enhag92, you said okay to this 6 hours ago. Have you forgotten or changed your mind?

~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my mind, nothing is wrong with me :) Enhag92 (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, please really don't, though; it's rarely helping and more likely to confuse or even annoy than to help, at least at WP:AIV where quick administrative action or declines of action are needed. Also, is there a specific edit count you're aiming for? Like... 500? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, ok so stop editing on AIV because if i continue, i will likely be blocked from editing. Enhag92 (talk) 12:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melon Playground (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The source you [Draft:BamCore added] is a Fandom site. Not reliable and cannot be used to show notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Melon Playground and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 03:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, i will continue to edit the draft, note that abandoned drafts may be deleted after 6 months Enhag92 (talk) 12:29, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was not sockpuppet, all my edits were constructive Enhag92 (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Enhag92! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:18, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]