User talk:Ecpiandy

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Ecpiandy. Thank you. Rainsage (talk) 02:46, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the thread with the following warning:

A misunderstanding about the implementation of TBANs has been resolved. Ecpiandy is given a logged warning for topic ban violations, and should understand that future violations are likely to result in a lengthy or indefinite block.

-- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 01:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tamzin and SilverLocust, you may not have noticed this edit as of 21:02, 17 February 2025. I don't think they get it. Cinderella157 (talk) 07:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cinderella157: I don't see how that edit would violates a topic ban from the Arab–Israeli conflict, broadly construed (or how it would otherwise be a contentious topics issue). The article mentions the conflict in a different section, but the whole article isn't so inherently tied to the conflict that even that capitalization change would be editing about the conflict. SilverLocust 💬 07:44, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I looked at that edit before closing. It's the sort of topic-area-adjacent edit that is often risky to make, because if one makes enough of them sooner or later one may well slip up and cross the line. But it does not itself violate the TBAN. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 07:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My own experience was that people playing fancy dress in WW2 uniforms was close enough to the German war effort. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not relevant at all to the Israeli-Arab conflict and you know that, leave my talk page being deliberately disingenuous don't comment again on here.

If I edit a Russia article does that mean I'm automatically commenting on the Russo-Ukrainian War? Of course not. Yet that's your argument. Ecpiandy (talk) 15:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Meredith Grey

Meredith Grey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North Valley Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on North Valley Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DankPedia (talk) 03:18, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North Valley Hospital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Valley Hospital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Valley Hospital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DankPedia (talk) 23:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]