User talk:EJAZ72

March 2025

Hello, I'm Alachuckthebuck. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Moose Scheib have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 17:01, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Moose Scheib. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Anerdw (talk) 19:50, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EJAZ72! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Moose Scheib several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Moose Scheib, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Your proposed edits have been reverted multiple times. Please start a discussion on the talk page.. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]