User talk:Cosmicsight

This is Cosmicsight's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: LID-568 (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LID-568 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cosmicsight! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ratnahastin (talk) 05:26, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LID-568

Hello, Cosmicsight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "LID-568".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 06:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Fountains of Bryn Mawr. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 01:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Refracting telescope, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Name calling of other editors is not nice, not productive and not permitted on Wikipedia. Please don't do it again. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:06, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While your contributions to Wikipedia are much appreciated, the problem with them seems to be that they focus on adding cites and external links to one website. Please understand that external links should be about either linking to official websites or authorities related to the article subject, or websites that provide content that cannot be on Wikipedia (e.g. for reasons of copyright). Adding links to a website that effectively repeats what the article already says, or says things that could be added to the article, raises suspicions that improving Wikipedia is not the purpose of these edits. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 18:27, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:02, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]