User talk:Cintagothy

June 2025

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Astragalus (plant), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ... and the sources do not meet WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 23:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah! Thank you! I just saw this - I'll be happy to change the formatting. Cintagothy (talk) 12:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Astragalus (plant) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You've made the same 3 unformatted, poorly sourced edits in 24 hours. Please learn how to use Wikipedia first, and do not edit war. Zefr (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)