User talk:CharoensinAsset

Welcome!

Hello, CharoensinAsset, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:CharoensinAsset, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:CharoensinAsset

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:CharoensinAsset, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:12, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CharoensinAsset (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I created the page for information and I do apologies if it came out as promotional content. I just wanted to create more credibility with the username when providing the content on Wikipedia. I've changed the name to something else, and if you could please let me know what areas of the article is promotional, I'll edit it out.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, it has been over a month since we last heard from you, so I'm declining this stale unblock request. If you would like to continue editing in the future, feel free to submit another unblock request addressing the concerns raised. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New posts to bottom, please. 331dot (talk) 07:41, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for this company, that needs to be disclosed, please see conflict of interest and paid editing. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell about themselves and what they do. A Wikipedia article about a company summarizes what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. We don't want to know what a company says about itself, only what others wholly unconnected with it have chosen to say about it. Our articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the topic. What edits do you wish to make? 331dot (talk) 07:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to change my username and re-write the article to meet Wikipedia's requirements. I've conducted the following edits of going into other articles and editing it, so I got an idea about article types, but for a brand that doesn't have much online coverage and writing about them, because of what they do intrigued me. When you mention wholly unconnected with it, does that include living in one of their buildings? I'd like to take this opportunity to apologize for not checking the check list, but further articles I write for the sake of readers will comply with Wikipedia's regulation. Thank you for the reply @331dot331dot CharoensinAsset (talk) 08:03, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To help administrators respond to the request, please do the following:

Review Wikipedia's payment disclosure and conflict of interest policies and guidelines, then explain how those apply to your block.
Describe the types of edits you would like to make if you were unblocked.

Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merely living in one of their properties would not be a conflict of interest, as long as they know nothing about what you are doing here. If there is not much coverage of them, it is doubtful that they meet the criteria for an article. 331dot (talk) 08:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]