User talk:Caitpj
June 2025
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Institute of Economic Affairs. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 16:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please can you explain the reasoning behind labelling my edits unconstructive. My changes were intended to improve compliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Namely their neutral point of view policy. I am happy to argue my case for these edits more thoroughly, but to simply label them unconstructive and disruptive without any reason is both unfair and untrue. Caitpj (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Removal of sourced content in a neutral narrative is disruptive. Do not disrupt Wikipedia further. Cambial — foliar❧ 18:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- As I have said three times now, it is not a neutral narrative. I may add that your responses have been frankly rude and condescending. Please do keep in mind Wikipedia's policy on civility in future conversations or I will have to report you. Caitpj (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Feel free to do so. Given you have no basis on which to make such a "report", it will be amusing. Cambial — foliar❧ 21:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- As I have said three times now, it is not a neutral narrative. I may add that your responses have been frankly rude and condescending. Please do keep in mind Wikipedia's policy on civility in future conversations or I will have to report you. Caitpj (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Removal of sourced content in a neutral narrative is disruptive. Do not disrupt Wikipedia further. Cambial — foliar❧ 18:37, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Cambial — foliar❧ 09:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 09:39, 14 June 2025 (UTC)