User talk:Blue.shik227

Welcome!

Hello, Blue.shik227, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Shikatani Lacroix Design, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 20:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shikatani Lacroix Design

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Shikatani Lacroix Design, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. VViking_TalkEdits 20:58, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

COI awareness notice

You appear to have a close connection to a subject about which you have written on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 06:58, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue.shik227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Blue.shik227 (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am requesting to be unblocked, I have read the notices and understand where I have violated the rules. This is my first time writing a wikipedia article. I have learnt the best way to cite now and how to rewrite the copy in a more neutral tone by reviewing other examples of articles and the wikipedia guidelines. Blue.shik227 (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't completed the appeal correctly. Please try again. Deb (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue.shik227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked for appearing to be used solely for advertising or promotion. I want to sincerely apologize, as that was not my intention. I now realize that the draft I created for Shikatani Lacroix Design may have contained promotional language or lacked sufficient independent sourcing, which goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines.

My intention was to create a neutral, verifiable, and encyclopedic article about Shikatani Lacroix Design, a design agency. I now recognize that the draft may not have adhered closely enough to Wikipedia’s guidelines on tone, sourcing, and notability.

I am committed to rewriting the article from a neutral point of view, incorporating reliable secondary sources to establish notability as defined by WP:ORG and WP:GNG, and ensuring that all language is factual and free of promotional tone. I have also reviewed the policies at Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), Wikipedia:Spam, and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations to guide my future contributions.

I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies on promotional content, including WP:NOT, WP:ADVERT, and WP:ORG, and I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and citing reliable secondary sources.

If unblocked, I will ensure that all future contributions are written in an encyclopedic tone, strictly follow Wikipedia's content policies, and seek guidance through the proper review channels such as the Articles for Creation process.

If unblocked, I will take greater care to align with Wikipedia’s content standards and seek help from experienced editors at the Teahouse or Articles for Creation review process to ensure compliance. Thank you for considering my request Blue.shik227 (talk) 14:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was written by an AI(100% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you directly. An AI cannot tell us what is inside your mind. Please write in your own words without the aid of an AI. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Blue.shik227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked for appearing to be used solely for advertising or promotion. I now realize that the draft I created for Shikatani Lacroix Design may have contained promotional language or lacked sufficient independent sourcing, which goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will make sure to not embellish the language I use in the article and keep it completely neutral. I will also ensure not to use the same citations twice or include any links that are directed to any commerce cite, in the perceived plight of encouraging readers to buy. That was not my intention, I simply was trying to use the links because they included the book summary but I am now aware of the mistake. I have also learned that having more citations is not better than having quality citations. I will be more filtered about my sources. I apologize this is my first time navigating Wikipedia. My intentions is not to advertise but to be informative as possible. But now I see that by adding unnecessary information and not the top quality citations, I was doing the opposite. My new focus is to make the article, neutral toned, straightforward, and prioritize quality citations. I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies on promotional content. If unblocked I will make these immediate changes Blue.shik227 (talk) 19:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that my account was blocked for appearing to be used solely for advertising or promotion. I now realize that the draft I created for Shikatani Lacroix Design may have contained promotional language or lacked sufficient independent sourcing, which goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will make sure to not embellish the language I use in the article and keep it completely neutral. I will also ensure not to use the same citations twice or include any links that are directed to any commerce cite, in the perceived plight of encouraging readers to buy. That was not my intention, I simply was trying to use the links because they included the book summary but I am now aware of the mistake. I have also learned that having more citations is not better than having quality citations. I will be more filtered about my sources. I apologize this is my first time navigating Wikipedia. My intentions is not to advertise but to be informative as possible. But now I see that by adding unnecessary information and not the top quality citations, I was doing the opposite. My new focus is to make the article, neutral toned, straightforward, and prioritize quality citations.  I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies on promotional content. If unblocked I will make these immediate changes [[User:Blue.shik227|Blue.shik227]] ([[User talk:Blue.shik227#top|talk]]) 19:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my account was blocked for appearing to be used solely for advertising or promotion. I now realize that the draft I created for Shikatani Lacroix Design may have contained promotional language or lacked sufficient independent sourcing, which goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will make sure to not embellish the language I use in the article and keep it completely neutral. I will also ensure not to use the same citations twice or include any links that are directed to any commerce cite, in the perceived plight of encouraging readers to buy. That was not my intention, I simply was trying to use the links because they included the book summary but I am now aware of the mistake. I have also learned that having more citations is not better than having quality citations. I will be more filtered about my sources. I apologize this is my first time navigating Wikipedia. My intentions is not to advertise but to be informative as possible. But now I see that by adding unnecessary information and not the top quality citations, I was doing the opposite. My new focus is to make the article, neutral toned, straightforward, and prioritize quality citations.  I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies on promotional content. If unblocked I will make these immediate changes [[User:Blue.shik227|Blue.shik227]] ([[User talk:Blue.shik227#top|talk]]) 19:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my account was blocked for appearing to be used solely for advertising or promotion. I now realize that the draft I created for Shikatani Lacroix Design may have contained promotional language or lacked sufficient independent sourcing, which goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will make sure to not embellish the language I use in the article and keep it completely neutral. I will also ensure not to use the same citations twice or include any links that are directed to any commerce cite, in the perceived plight of encouraging readers to buy. That was not my intention, I simply was trying to use the links because they included the book summary but I am now aware of the mistake. I have also learned that having more citations is not better than having quality citations. I will be more filtered about my sources. I apologize this is my first time navigating Wikipedia. My intentions is not to advertise but to be informative as possible. But now I see that by adding unnecessary information and not the top quality citations, I was doing the opposite. My new focus is to make the article, neutral toned, straightforward, and prioritize quality citations.  I have reviewed Wikipedia's policies on promotional content. If unblocked I will make these immediate changes [[User:Blue.shik227|Blue.shik227]] ([[User talk:Blue.shik227#top|talk]]) 19:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please place new posts at the bottom, so they stay in order. This may be easier to do if you click "edit" and not "reply"; the reply function is imperfect and doesn't work well in every situation. 331dot (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]