Jump to content

User talk:Averageuntitleduser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2025 Update from Women in Green

[edit]

Hello Averageuntitleduser:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mother Solomon

[edit]

On 4 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mother Solomon, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mother Solomon (pictured) returned to Ohio 22 years after the Indian Removal Act forced her people, the Wyandots, into Kansas? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mother Solomon. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mother Solomon), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 00:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dédée Bazile

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dédée Bazile you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dédée Bazile

[edit]

The article Dédée Bazile you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dédée Bazile and Talk:Dédée Bazile/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 02:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How to see how many articles use a source

[edit]

Hey!! Thank you so much for the review of Boneyard AKA Fearmonger! I just wanted to ask how you saw how many FAs/GAs include a specific source, I think that'd be very helpful for me in the future when determining if a source is fine or not (if it's not listed at WP:A/S). Thank you again !!! Locust member (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: Of course. In the search box, you can use the insource: and hastemplate: paramaters together to find articles that cite a specific source and have a GA/FA template. See this for example. You may also find WP:PetScan helpful. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate it :) Locust member (talk) 03:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Golden Time (film)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Averageuntitleduser. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Golden Time (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fishmonger

[edit]

Hey, it's me again! I just wanted to let you know I created the Fishmonger article and put it up for GA. I would love, if you have the time of course, if you were to review it–I feel like it wouldn't be appropriate to get it reviewed by somebody other than you !! Locust member (talk) 22:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: I would love to. Expect to see me there in a few days. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 15:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, thank you so much!!! Locust member (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Dédée Bazile

[edit]

The article Dédée Bazile you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dédée Bazile for comments about the article, and Talk:Dédée Bazile/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Borsoka -- Borsoka (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green's May 2025 edit-a-thon

[edit]

Hello Averageuntitleduser: WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Editathon event in May 2025!

Running from May 1 to 31, 2025, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) editathon event – Wildcard Edition! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to any and all women and women's works during the event period. Want to improve an article about a women's rights activist? Go for it. An Olympian gold medallist? Absolutely. A famous painting by a woman? Yes! GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to receive a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. We hope to see you there!

(You are receiving this message as you are on the Women in Green mailing list. If you wish to opt out of receiving future messages, feel free to remove yourself from the list.) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Food House

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Food House you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 23:25, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Food House

[edit]

The article Food House you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Food House and Talk:Food House/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 02:43, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Food House

[edit]

The article Food House you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Food House for comments about the article, and Talk:Food House/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 13:43, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

[edit]
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:TechnoSquirrel69 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I first encountered Averageuntitleduser when he provided a GAN review for Worlds (Porter Robinson album), and, even with less than a thousand edits to his name at the time, impressed me with his knowledge of how to write great articles and ability to provide actionable feedback. As his user page shows, he's made many more excellent reviews and built up a portfolio of his own quality writing, including several GAs on Haitian women, an FL, and my personal favorite: Mother Solomon. I see in AUU a formidable content writer who seems only to be getting started, and I hope you'll join me in appreciating his contributions to the project. This nomination was seconded by Vacant0, QuicoleJR, and HouseBlaster.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Averageuntitleduser in his habitat
Averageuntitleduser
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning May 5, 2025
Averageuntitleduser provided a GAN review for Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and with less than a thousand edits to his name at the time, impressed many with his ability of how to write great articles and participate in actionable feedback. As his user page shows, he has made many more excellent reviews and built up a portfolio of quality writing, including several GAs on Haitian women, an FL and Mother Solomon. He is a formidable content writer who seems only to be getting started. His contributions to the project are appreciated.
Recognized for
writing great articles
Notable work
Marie-Jeanne Lamartinière
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster7 Chat 19:31, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:TechnoSquirrel69, and all who seconded! This is so kind! I've only begun, but I see myself sticking around for a long time and trying to make a dent in some systemic biases. At least, my my to-do list seems to never stop growing. Thanks again! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 02:39, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed---a squirrel awarded a racoon. Only at Wikipedia!Buster7 Chat 03:31, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contingency Song

[edit]

Hey! Just wanted to let you know I put up "Contingency Song" for FAC. The PR was closed for inactivity, so I went ahead put it up for the final boss. Would love comments from you (and just wanted to let you know in case you were wondering why the PR was archived). Locust member (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Locust member: yeah, I saw the peer review was closed. The article seems ready enough for FAC though, and it helps that it is so short. I have signed on there. Averageuntitleduser (talk) 19:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]