User talk:Arno Koch

Your submission at Articles for creation: Small Group Activity (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Small Group Activity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pythoncoder: I am a bit puzzled by your remark: being an autor of multiple books maybe my style is rather 'educational'. Unfortunately I do not see where you base this judgement on. Could you please help me out and tell me what you see and I don't?? Tnxs! Arno Koch Arno Koch (talk) 13:05, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arno Koch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 11:46, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Small Group Activity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Small Group Activity. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:20, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Draft:Small Group Activity

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Draft:Small Group Activity, which you proposed for deletion. Drafts cannot be deleted using the WP:PROD process. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this draft should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the draft. You may review speedy deletion criteria at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, and tag the page with one of those critera if any apply. You may also, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion; however, first please read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Before nominating a page for deletion to see the guidelines. Thanks! Casablanca 🪨^(T) 15:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Casablanca Rock thank you for your kind message. I have searched everywhere how to delete it and this is what I came up with ... I'll read the pages once more, otherwise after 6 months it will be deleted anyway... have a nice day, best, Arno Arno Koch (talk) 18:03, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]