User talk:Ariful Mishu

Your username

You can request a username change by filling out the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest. Before doing so, please note that Wikipedia accounts are meant for individuals, so please choose a username that represents you individually. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:17, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I have already applied for a username change. Can you help me write Mobile Specification articles like vivo v19,vivo v9 Electronic Specification (talk) 16:42, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have renamed your account. To learn more about creating your first article, check out Help:Your first article. – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ariful Mishu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! – DreamRimmer (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How To Write Mobile Specification Articles

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am Ariful Mishu, I run a website about mobile specifications where I write specifications about various mobilesAnd I have experience in this subject I noticed that there is no information about many mobiles in Wikipedia. I want to add information about all those mobiles.

For this, what else can I do besides using Template:Infobox Mobile phone and how many references should I add?

(~~~~) Ariful Mishu (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile phones are like nearly every other subject on Wikipedia. There can be an article if you have something like 3 independent articles about the phone with in-depth coverage. Be wary of press releases and release announcements, since they are not considered independent even if there is not much reason to suspect their reliability. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably add a few additional cautions based on how you introduced yourself. You should not add citations to your own website or any information that is based solely on your own authority. Your knowledge is useful because you likely know better than the average user where to find reliable published information about phones - refer to those sources. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:32, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walton orbit y71 (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walton orbit y71 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to say I forgot to add an Official Website for Reference

But I am now adding an Official Website for Reference

(Ariful Mishu (talk) 15:34, 17 March 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, Ariful Mishu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:03, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walton orbit y71 (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Neither of the sources shows significant coverage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walton orbit y71 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:51, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walton XANON X91 (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of WP:GNG. The first source is not independent and the second does not show significant coverage of the product.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Walton XANON X91 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vivo X30 Pro moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vivo X30 Pro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Old-AgedKid (talk) 13:47, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Ariful Mishu. Thank you for your work on Realme C11. Another editor, Mrfoogles, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Currently this article has citations, but not to reliable sources discussing it -- just to specifications. Here are some reviews I found while googling: https://www.nextpit.com/realme-c11-review, https://gadgetsnow.indiatimes.com/reviews/realme-c11-review-up-to-the-mark/articleshow/76686821.cms, https://www.gadgets360.com/mobiles/reviews/realme-c11-review-india-price-under-10000-camera-performance-2270881

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mrfoogles}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mrfoogles (talk) 14:46, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mrfoogles,

Thank you for reviewing the Realme C11 article and for your helpful feedback. I appreciate you providing additional reliable sources. I will work on incorporating content from the reviews you shared to improve the article’s quality and strengthen its references.

Apart from this, I have done more work on other articles as well. If you would like, you are welcome to take a look at those too. Realme X3,Vivo V17,Vivo S1 Pro,Realme 7i,Realme 6S,Realme X7,Realme C15

Thanks again for your guidance and support! Ariful Mishu (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vivo S1 Pro moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vivo S1 Pro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 16:06, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Realme C15

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Realme C15, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GrabUp - Talk 16:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I respectfully contest the speedy deletion of the Realme C15 article. The purpose of the page was to provide factual and neutral information about the device, including its specifications, launch details, and notable features. It was not intended to promote any company or product.

I am committed to revising the content to ensure it adheres fully to Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability guidelines, including the addition of independent, reliable sources. I request the opportunity to make these improvements to meet Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for your consideration.

— GrabUp Ariful Mishu (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Realme X7

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Realme X7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GrabUp - Talk 16:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I respectfully contest the speedy deletion of the Realme x7 article. The purpose of the page was to provide factual and neutral information about the device, including its specifications, launch details, and notable features. It was not intended to promote any company or product.

I am committed to revising the content to ensure it adheres fully to Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability guidelines, including the addition of independent, reliable sources. I request the opportunity to make these improvements to meet Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for your consideration.

— GrabUp Ariful Mishu (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Realme 6S

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Realme 6S, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GrabUp - Talk 16:13, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I respectfully contest the speedy deletion of the Realme 6S article. The purpose of the page was to provide factual and neutral information about the device, including its specifications, launch details, and notable features. It was not intended to promote any company or product.

I am committed to revising the content to ensure it adheres fully to Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability guidelines, including the addition of independent, reliable sources. I request the opportunity to make these improvements to meet Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for your consideration.

— GrabUp Ariful Mishu (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Walton XANON X91

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Walton XANON X91, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vivo X30 Pro

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vivo X30 Pro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Realme 7i

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Realme 7i, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:36, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely apologize for violating Wikipedia’s guidelines through my actions. I acknowledge that I made a mistake, but it was not intentional. I now understand the importance of Wikipedia’s policies on neutrality and advertising. I promise to contribute responsibly and follow all rules carefully from now on. Please give me another chance so I can correct myself and make constructive contributions to Wikipedia. Ariful Mishu (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ariful Mishu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I respectfully request an unblock. I understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a platform for advertising or promotion. My intention was to contribute factual, neutral information about notable topics, not to advertise. I apologize if my contributions appeared promotional — I am willing to correct any mistakes and edit strictly according to Wikipedia's neutrality and verifiability standards. I am committed to following all guidelines moving forward.

When I created pages, I collected information by researching reliable sources such as GSMArena, Electronic Specifications, and the official websites. My intention was only to summarize technical details and factual information, not to advertise or promote any company or product.

I now understand that even using official sources can appear promotional if the tone is not neutral enough. I sincerely apologize for any mistakes. I am committed to editing strictly according to Wikipedia’s neutrality, verifiability, and sourcing policies from now on.

If there are no major issues with the overall structure of the pages I previously created, I kindly request reconsideration of my block and the articles I contributed.

Thank you for your understanding and consideration. Ariful Mishu (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm very concerned that you thought statements like "it offers flagship-grade performance at an affordable price" and "It offers a sleek design with a 6.44-inch Super AMOLED display and powerful performance" were factual and neutral. You were doing a lot more than "summarize technical details"- and articles need to do more than that, they need to summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic. I don't know if you work in the cell phone industry, and you don't need to tell if you do, but you're not yet ready to contribute about cell phones. If you want to edit about other topics, please tell what. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello 331dot,(talk)

Thank you for your response and for taking the time to review my request. I understand your concerns regarding the neutrality and tone of my contributions. I now realize that phrases like "flagship-grade performance" and "sleek design" could be perceived as promotional rather than neutral. I sincerely apologize for any impression of advertising or bias in my edits.

My intention was to provide factual, neutral summaries from reliable sources, and I regret not fully adhering to Wikipedia’s neutrality guidelines. I appreciate your feedback and will ensure future contributions maintain a more objective tone, summarizing independent, reliable sources.

I also understand that technical details alone are insufficient, and I will focus on providing a balanced view based on what independent sources say. If I contribute to other topics, I will adhere more closely to Wikipedia’s sourcing and neutrality standards.

If possible, I kindly request one more chance to contribute with a renewed commitment to neutrality and verifiability. I am eager to improve and contribute positively to the Wikipedia community.

Thank you again for your understanding and consideration. --Ariful Mishu (talk) 07:13, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to talk to a chatbot, I want to talk with you. I didn't run your request through a checker because it was an easy decline on the merits, but we don't consider AI written requests. Please write in your own words. You may make a new request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

331dot (talk)

I'm sorry to bother you. I originally wanted to add more information about smartphones to Wikipedia that is not on Wikipedia. But I made a mistake while doing this and broke Wikipedia rules. I'm sorry. Can't I be given another chance so that I can fix myself?

--Ariful Mishu (talk) 09:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivo S1 Pro (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lack of significant coverage per WP:GNG. No significant prose coverage in any of the sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivo S1 Pro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:56, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivo X30 Pro draft (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivo X30 Pro draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Realme Narzo 20 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Realme Narzo 20. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:20, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Realme C17 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Realme C17. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:21, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me another chance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ariful Mishu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry to bother you. I originally wanted to add more information about smartphones to Wikipedia that is not on Wikipedia. But I made a mistake while doing this and broke Wikipedia rules. I'm sorry. Can't I be given another chance so that I can fix myself?Ariful Mishu (talk) 12:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with 331dot about you not being ready to edit about phones. Is there anything else you want to edit? PhilKnight (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ariful Mishu (talk) 12:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight (talk)

Honestly, I can't edit anything other than mobile phones. I basically have an idea about mobile, so it's not possible for me to edit anything else. If you give me a chance, I can add more information to the previously created pages without creating a new page. Because I have an idea about mobile, I am involved in this topic. That's why I started writing about it on Wikipedia, but I made a mistake.

(Ariful Mishu (talk) 14:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC))[reply]

All you did was create promotional pages about various mobile phones and using spamlinks (to your own website) as citations.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]