User talk:Apriliantosetyadi

This is Apriliantosetyadi's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ant International (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ant International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apriliantosetyadi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your message and the helpful resources.

I understand that my draft was declined, and I’m working on improving it. I’ve reviewed the notability guidelines and ensured that the subject is supported by reliable, independent sources such as [insert 2–3 example sources here]. I’ve also revised the language to be more neutral and encyclopedic.

If possible, I’d appreciate any specific feedback on what else could be improved so the draft can meet Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you again for your time and support! Apriliantosetyadi (talk) 03:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You know you're supposed to actually insert sources inside the brackets instead of blindly copypasting what your LLM chatbot spat out, right? —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ant International (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

The comment the reviewer left was:

100% AI generated

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ant International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ant International (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ant International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:47, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pythoncoder , thank you for reviewing my draft on Ant International. I noticed that the submission was declined with the reason that it contains promotional or advertising content.

Could you kindly help me understand specifically which parts of the article or which sources were considered promotional? I’d like to revise it to meet Wikipedia’s neutrality and sourcing standards, but I want to make sure I correct the appropriate sections.

Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. Apriliantosetyadi (talk) 05:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Apriliantosetyadi, here is my guidance: Please stop using LLM chatbots to write articles and talk page comments. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:26, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to User talk:Pythoncoder, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:18, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]