Jump to content

User talk:Andrew Gray/Archives/23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Signpost: 16 October 2013

Media coverage on Wiki-PR, the multi-million-dollar US-based company that has broken several policies and guidelines on the English Wikipedia in its quest to create and maintain thousands of articles for paying clients, continued this week with a feature story by Martin Robbins in the British edition of Vice magazine.
A slow week, with low overall views and the Top 10 dominated by longstanding pages. Gravity, Alfonso Cuaron's outer space-set action art film, not only held its position at the top of the US box office but climbed to the top of the Wikipedia chart as well, showing that it has become a major talking point.
This week, we studied coats of arms and flags with the folks at WikiProject Heraldry and Vexillology. Started in September 2006, the project has grown to include 20 Featured Articles and nearly 50 Good Articles. The project maintains a portal, a list of resources, and a variety of images and templates.
Six articles, two lists, and thirty-three pictures were promoted to 'featured' status on the English Wikipedia last week.
The Manning naming dispute case has closed, with a strong and unanimous statement by the Committee against disparaging references to transgendered persons. Sanctions were enacted against six editors.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...

Please comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Geonotice

Hi Andrew, thanks for putting up the geonotice so quickly! I just realized I forgot to add a link to Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 8 in the notice, is there any way you could add that as a piped link to the words "Chicago meetup"? Sorry to impose. Thanks so much! Keilana|Parlez ici 16:10, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Done - I've removed the Pritzker link to avoid confusion. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Geonotice expert?

Hi Andrew. I've removed the Training for Trainers event from the geonotice, because it wasn't working. Do you happen to have a solution? WormTT(talk) 08:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

I've nudged Reedy on meta to see if he can update the interwiki shortcut cache. That would mean that wmuk: would point to the right site and we can just change the geonotice to the more standard interwiki wikilink. ... if that makes sense. WormTT(talk) 08:58, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

09:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #81

Since the prod that led to your deletion was not valid as the article had previously been proded and deproded I have restored the article and taken it to AfD, where you would be welcome to contribute to the discussion. --Michig (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of 20th Century Fox films. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.Legobot (talk) 00:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

The next twice-yearly round of Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) grantmaking is soon to close for community questioning and commentary. Ten nation-based Wikimedia chapters and one thematic organisation are asking for a total of more than US$5M of donors’ money from the Foundation’s renamed annual plan grant process. Aside from Wikimedia UK ($708k), the three biggest asks are from the German-speaking chapters: Wikimedia Germany is asking for $2.4M and Wikimedia Austria $311k; and the German-language-related Swiss chapter is applying for $500k.
Media, sports and Google Doodles dominate, though a very odd fish decided to crash the party.
Twelve articles, four lists, and four pictures were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia this week, including the article on cabbage.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...
MIT Technology Review published a long article on what it called "The decline of Wikipedia". Editor involvement has decreased since 2007; according to the article, this has had an adverse qualitative effect on content, particularly on issues pertinent to non-British and American male geeks.
This week, we headed to an elementary subject with WikiProject Elements. Founded by Mav in 2002, this project has grown to have 19 featured articles, 2 featured topics, and 68 good articles. The project also has a list of templates, and a periodic table of elements filled with pictures.

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

09:39, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
49 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Drumlanrig Castle (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 15th (Scottish) Infantry Division (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start St Andrew's West (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Territorial Force (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lady Kirk (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub Essex County Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Americus V. Rice (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Charles P. Cabell (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start BL 8-inch howitzer Mk VI – VIII (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub 17th (Northern) Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub 19th (Western) Division (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub 23rd Division (United Kingdom) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
202 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Open access journal (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
195 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA Kwaito (talk) Please add more images Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Start Federal Reserve Deposits (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Holywell Manor, Oxford (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Merge
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub ROARMAP (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
793 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Def, Predicted class: B Accuracy International AWM (talk) Please add more sources Merge
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Japanese food supply ship Irako (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Wikify
149 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start OTO Melara 76 mm (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Wikify
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B 11th Infantry Regiment (United States) (talk) Please add more images Wikify
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aitpara (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alinda of the Loch (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alberta Basin (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kaibōkan (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Murthly (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Vaygach (icebreaker) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Glassford (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub St James Church, St Andrews (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: Stub St. Ignatius Church, Wishaw (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: B 145th Armored Regiment (United States) (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
134 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B United States Colored Troops (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
343 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Military history of African Americans (talk) Add sources
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: Start Hunt-class destroyer (talk) Please add more sources Add sources
1,072 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B 101st Airborne Division (talk) Add sources
381 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Philip Sheridan (talk) Add sources
102 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Start Secret and special weapons in Showa Japan (talk) Please add more sources Cleanup
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Japanese cruiser Aoba (talk) Please add more content Please add more sources Cleanup
104 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kongō-class destroyer (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more sources Cleanup
277 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: C Military history of France during World War II (talk) Expand
318 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA 3rd Infantry Division (United States) (talk) Please add more sources Expand
67 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA History of the Royal Australian Navy (talk) Expand
828 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Torpedo (talk) Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
88 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Iraqi insurgency (Iraq War) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
2,395 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Battle of Leyte Gulf (talk) Unencyclopaedic
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start 48th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Merge
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Italian cruiser Eugenio di Savoia (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub National Games of Colombia (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: List, Predicted class: Start Bibliography of American Civil War Union military unit histories (talk) Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
42 Quality: High, Assessed class: Unassessed, Predicted class: FA Iraq Body Count project (talk) Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Wikify
44 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: FA USS Sailfish (SS-192) (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Robert E. Gerstung (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ellis R. Weicht (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub David Dickie (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Japanese destroyer Suzunami (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Japanese destroyer Hayashimo (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Temporal Naval Armaments Supplement Programme (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
0 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start John Wainwright (Medal of Honor) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Japanese destroyer Kishinami (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
469 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start The Eccentric Family (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The WikiLovesMonument Barnstar
Not sure precisely how we're handing these out, but pfft, I struggle to think of a way in which your contributions to the success of WLM-UK 2013 would not deserve proper recognition. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 16:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks - very relieved we've got through to the end and have our winners selected, even if I had to bunk off mid-month! Andrew Gray (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ten Lost Tribes

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ten Lost Tribes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

  1. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)
  3. Canada Sasata (submissions)
  4. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
  5. New South Wales Casliber (submissions)
  6. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions)
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions)
  8. Poland Piotrus (submissions)
  9. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

  • New South Wales Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
  • Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
  • Portland, Oregon Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
  • Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
  • Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
  • Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
  • Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
  • Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
  • United States Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
  • The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to British Empire The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
  • Finally, the judges are awarding Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 00:13, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #82

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

The top 10 encapsulates the history of human aviation; at #1, a Google Doodle celebrating the 216th anniversary of the first parachute jump; at #10, the enduringly popular scifi film Gravity, a paean to human spaceflight. It's odd to think it's taken us 200 years to travel about that many miles up.
While giving a speech on behalf of a gubernatorial candidate, Paul advocated his pro-life position, and compared allowing unrestricted abortions to the film Gattaca. He went on to use strikingly similar language and phraseology in his speech to what the Wikipedia page reads. The Washington Post's article conceded that Wikipedia is a widely used source for trivial information, but mocked the fact that a politician would view it as a reliable source.
In January we raised several potentially troublesome issues for the Wikimedia movement in taking on Wikivoyage, including the apparent inadequacy of the English Wikivoyage sex-tourism policy, hurriedly strengthened against mention of child sex after our inquiries. However, both sex-tourism and illegal-activities policies remain equivocal about how the site should treat entries about sex tourism more generally, and drugs that are classed as illicit in almost every country. Yet the Signpost has found it remarkably easy to locate material in Wikivoyage that violates both the spirit and the letter of the policies.
This year's WikiCup competition has finished, while three articles, five lists, and six pictures, were promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia last week.
Laura Stein, a researcher at the University of Texas at Austin, has concluded that, based on her comparison of user policy documents (including the Terms of Service) of YouTube, Facebook and Wikipedia, Wikipedia offers the highest level of participation power overall.
With Halloween, the Day of the Dead, and other gloomy celebrations this week, we're taking a look at Wikipedia's dead and dying. For some dead WikiProjects, the sole purpose of their life was simply to serve as a warning to others. Some of these projects may still be salvageable, but for most, a revival is unlikely. Here are some projects that never got off the ground and the lessons that can be gleaned from their follies

Please comment on Talk:God

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:God. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

10:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lyndon LaRouche

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lyndon LaRouche. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Geonotice poke

Hi Andrew! I've posted a Geonotice that I was hoping could be activated soon, so any weekend-only editors in our area would have a chance to see the Geonotice before our meeting next Saturday. Thanks for your help! -- Gaurav (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #83

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

As part of the second major "outing" controversy to hit the English Wikipedia in less than a year, the Chelsea/Bradley Manning naming dispute was dragged into the spotlight yet again when the English Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee ruled by motion to remove the administrator tools from and ban long-time Wikipedia contributor Phil Sandifer.
It's fair to say that commemorating death was a strong theme this week, with Lou Reed's passing generating interest, as well as a Google Doodle celebrating the costume designer Edith Head. And of course, the world's greatest celebrations of the dead, Halloween and the Day of the Dead, were also popular this week.
HMS Hood, one of the most famous warships of the Second World War, was a battlecruiser and therefore part of what is now the largest featured topic on Wikipedia: "Battlecruisers of the world". The topic was promoted to "featured" status on the English Wikipedia last week alongside eleven articles, three lists, four pictures, and two other topics.
This week, we spent some time with WikiProject Accessibility, a project that strives to make Wikipedia accessible for users with disabilities. The project improves Wikipedia's guidelines and Manual of Style, collects useful templates and scripts, and provides support to impaired Wikipedians.
The Ebionites 3 case has closed with an interaction ban for the two editors involved in the dispute.
Current discussions on the English Wikipedia include...