User talk:AliveNull

This is AliveNull's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bhupalsagar has been accepted

Bhupalsagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:14, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Barol has been accepted

Barol, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 19:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gangrar tehsil, Chittorgarh (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

From my understanding Wikitia is another user-generated wiki, and for the same reasons you shouldn't cite Wikipedia itself, I'm gonna call it unreliable. The other sources also don't show how this place is notable either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gangrar tehsil, Chittorgarh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AliveNull! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please stop generating Wikipedia articles using AI. --Altenmann >talk 20:05, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranawaton Ka Khera (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not clear how exactly this is notable. Many claims also lack sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ranawaton Ka Khera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sajjanpura (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sajjanpura and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:14, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vansh Sayani (actor) (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The reliability of the Times of India is debatable. In any case, I would not call this a wide range of reliable, secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vansh Sayani (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 20:41, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image credits and COI

You've noted that "File:Vastav.AI Deepfake Detetction Software.jpg" is your own work. Would you please follow the guidelines at WP:COI and/or WP:PAID and disclose the nature of your relationship with that company? Please do that before making any other edits. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i learned from User:OpalYosutebito how to upload image so i followed that, I dont own the image its free to use AliveNull (talk) 23:07, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get it from? Does the place you acquired it from have a license that is compatible with free use? Sam Kuru (talk) 23:13, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

lot's many articles are using that logo

i found from f6s.com AliveNull (talk) 23:15, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, the image can only be utilized here if there's a release from the owners, or some claim of fair use. You may want to go to Commons and remove the "own work" tag on there - you've uploaded a copyright violation as it stands. Can you please answer the other questions I asked you? Sam Kuru (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sam Kuru,

Thanks for your message. Just to clarify — I am not the developer or representative of Vastav.AI, and I have no affiliation with the company. I came across the image on f6s.com and saw it used in multiple places online, so I assumed it was free to use. I now understand that uploading it as "own work" was incorrect, and I’ll remove it from Commons or mark it for deletion as appropriate.

Apologies for the mistake, and thank you for guiding me on this. I’ll be more careful with licensing and sourcing going forward.

Best,

AliveNull AliveNull (talk) 23:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to give you an opportunity to self-identify. There's been a massive spamming campaign from this particular company that you're really a fan of. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:24, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out. I understand your concern.

I want to clarify that I am not associated in any way paid, employed, or affiliated with the company mentioned. I came across the topic independently and tried to write about it from a neutral and informative perspective.

If there are any issues with the draft, I’m happy to revise it to better align with Wikipedia’s standards. AliveNull (talk) 23:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1 TRACE (OSINT) (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scaledish was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

spot check of news sources shows no author attached, read like PR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1 TRACE (OSINT) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 01:48, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vastav.AI this ? 103.179.196.199 (talk) 01:52, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Btw Santhosh per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 03:08, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]