User talk:Alessandro Durni

Welcome!

Hello, Alessandro Durni, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Alessandro Durni/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alessandro Durni/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Alessandro Durni/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Alessandro Durni. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to User:Alessandro Durni/sandbox, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alessandro Durni. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alessandro Durni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr.Drm310, I'm sorry if something seems wrong, but I'm only preparing a Draft on the Sandbox (That I don't think is shared with the community) about the story and goals of my company.

I'm actually preparing it following the wikipedia guidelines and using ChatGPT as confirmation if something is not respected.

I'm here for any feedback Alessandro Durni (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest.

It is also mandatory to disclose if you are employed by this company, to comply with Wikipedia's non-negotiable paid editing disclosure policy. Please do not many any further edits to your sandbox until this disclosure has been made. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also be aware that the paid editing disclosure policy exists on the Italian Wikipedia, where you have also been active. The relevant policy page there is it:Wikipedia:Avvertenze sulla contribuzione su commissione. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm reading it, thanks.

About this tag ({{paid}} tag removed by Drm310), I correctly added on my profile. Alessandro Durni (talk) 17:03, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The {{paid}} tag is required on only your userpage, which you did correctly. It is not required here, so I've removed it. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:13, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, according to this tag that I set on my userpage, I'm now allowed to continue the edit on the draft I have on the sandbox? Alessandro Durni (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't know if it would be worth trying with the current copy. I tagged it for speedy deletion because it is hopelessly promotional in nature, and because it is sourced almost entirely to your own company, which cannot prove that it is notable enough for inclusion. Since you can't remove the speedy deletion tag, better to wait for an admininstrator to rule on whether it gets deleted or retained.

Please review the Article for Creation process, which is the preferred way for an editor in your position to write about topics where there is a conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:12, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]