User talk:AdamSchor

June 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mary Pelloni have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —tony^{st (talk)} 00:32, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I’m fully aware of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guidelines and take them seriously. I’ve done my best to follow protocol by sticking to verifiable, third-party sources and avoiding editorial bias. My connection to the topic hasn’t influenced the content - my goal has been to improve the page’s accuracy and completeness.

If there are specific concerns about the material I contributed, I’m happy to address them directly. But a blanket assumption of bias isn’t a reason to dismiss good-faith, well-sourced edits.

AdamSchor (talk) 00:48, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I’m fully aware of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guidelines and take them seriously. I’ve done my best to follow protocol by sticking to verifiable, third-party sources and avoiding editorial bias. My connection to the topic hasn’t influenced the content - my goal has been to improve the page’s accuracy and completeness.

If there are specific concerns about the material I contributed, I’m happy to address them directly. But a blanket assumption of bias isn’t a reason to dismiss good-faith, well-sourced AdamSchor (talk) 00:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mary Pelloni. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —tony^{st (talk)} 00:33, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, AdamSchor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Douglas County High School (Colorado), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. —tony^{st (talk)} 00:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I’m fully aware of Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guidelines and take them seriously. I’ve done my best to follow protocol by sticking to verifiable, third-party sources and avoiding editorial bias. My connection to the topic hasn’t influenced the content - my goal has been to improve the page’s accuracy and completeness.

If there are specific concerns about the material I contributed, I’m happy to address them directly. But a blanket assumption of bias isn’t a reason to dismiss good-faith, well-sourced AdamSchor (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Schor (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fancy Refrigerator were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Schor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 01:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AdamSchor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 01:52, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Schor (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks independent sources to publish notability. Few of the sources may act as secondary sources, but not sufficient enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Schor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]