User talk:AISHWARYA4569

Welcome!

Hello, AISHWARYA4569!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:46, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tuhin Kanta Pandey has been accepted

Tuhin Kanta Pandey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:17, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Linwei30 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Linwei30. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AISHWARYA4569 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here hello sir I m admitting my mistake for abusing that person on M. Damodaran page. The reason for doing was that I had already done an edit where I mentioned his educational qualifications but had forgotten to back it with a reliable source and then the person to whom I abused reverted my edit due to which I got little bit angry and made some derogatory words towards this was purely out of anger. After then I edited it again and this time added his educational qualification but with a reliable source. I admit my mistake of abusing him. please note again this was done purely out of anger and if you go through my past wikipedia edits of this account and also of my other accounts that are also banned then you will find out that I was never involved in any type of abusing activity. I always edited wikipedia page by backing that edit with a reliable source. I sincerely request you to please unban me. AISHWARYA4569 (talk) 4:34 pm, Today (UTC−4) also, I ASSURE you that this mistake from my side will be never be repeated again.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:14, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AISHWARYA4569 (talk) 20:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{okay sir if that's the final answer then okay I accept this as my mistake. and now I will not make any further requests for unblocking me. and will never ever visit wikipedia in my whole lifetime.

thank you.}} AISHWARYA4569 (talk) 22:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

jpgordon

okay sir if that's the final answer then okay I accept this as my mistake. and now I will not make any further requests for unblocking me. and will never ever visit wikipedia in my whole lifetime.

thank you

AISHWARYA4569 (talk) 22:59, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]