User talk:AFEG64

Minor edits

Hi AFEG64! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AFEG64, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AFEG64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Minor edits, part II

Hello. Again, please do not mark major edits as minor. A minor edits means a correction, formatting or layout change, adding wikilinks or removing vandalism. Anything else is a major edit. Any information you add to an article is a major edit. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 10:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your service on trying to destroy misinformation on the DE page, even if it didn't work you still fucking tried. Lukebwhoiscool (talk) 23:14, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Complaints about WP:TRUTH

I'm a bit concerned about the complaints about WP:TRUTH you have been making at Dark Enlightenment. I would suggest, if you believe contradicting reliable sources exist that support the claim that the Dark Enlightenment philosophy is not neo-fascist, that you would be better served going to Wikipedia Library and looking for such sources than you would be complaining that Wikipedia is, well, Wikipedia. The one thing I will note about Wikipedia library is that, while it is an invaluable resource, it does, if I recall correctly, require extended confirmed status to access. You might want to consider working on some additional edits that don't require quite that level of access to academic sources to reach the necessary number of edits and then gain access to it. Simonm223 (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks AFEG64 (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]