User talk:2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110
March 2025
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Patrik Schick, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:02, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- There is no need for a source- most sentences in the forst few paragraphs of this article don’t have one. Besides, news is not reliable, most of these newspapers only care about celebrity ’showbiz’ and creating clickbait articles and slow websites full of ads to make you pay money 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:05, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- The introduction does not need to be cited as long as it summarizes information (which is cited) later on in the body – you can read more about this at MOS:CITELEAD. However, since you added a standalone sentence, it needs a citation from a reliable source, and not from a website with "clickbait articles and slow websites full of ads", as you put it. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well, these websites include, the Sun, the Telegraph, the Daily Mail and the Times, which are usually considered reliable 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- The Sun and the Daily Mail are considered unreliable by the Wikipedia community. The Telegraph and the Times are fine - if you have links, you may cite them on the page. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- But just beacause nobody has put an article out about him being the best strikers in in the world doesn’t mean he isn’t- just look at his stats, it’s only facts. 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Can we please be friends as I don’t have any 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- The Sun and the Daily Mail are considered unreliable by the Wikipedia community. The Telegraph and the Times are fine - if you have links, you may cite them on the page. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well, these websites include, the Sun, the Telegraph, the Daily Mail and the Times, which are usually considered reliable 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- The introduction does not need to be cited as long as it summarizes information (which is cited) later on in the body – you can read more about this at MOS:CITELEAD. However, since you added a standalone sentence, it needs a citation from a reliable source, and not from a website with "clickbait articles and slow websites full of ads", as you put it. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
- Also, can we be friends? 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:8898:CB94:79C2:6110 (talk) 22:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Patrik Schick. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |