User talk:204.225.215.56

Reliable sources...

You need a better location than that, which veers off into user-generated content TEDickey (talk) 22:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean by "location"? Did you even look at the source? It is a user manual from the manufacturer of the product being described. It is acceptable as a source for simple objective facts about the product, per WP:PRIMARY. 204.225.215.56 (talk) 23:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

If it were published, you would not have to paste it into a website which has no likelihood of being visible, say, six months from now. Read the guidelines instead of making it up TEDickey (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

What are you even talking about? It's published in the same way any operating manual is. You're using words in a way that doesn't make much sense. Is your issue with the hosting website? 204.225.215.56 (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I still don't understand what you mean.

"Read the guidelines" - I have. At least they're easier to understand than you are. Product manuals are acceptable sources for simple product facts.

"If it were published" - Are you implying the user manual was not published? That it was written and then leaked somehow? Or that it was completely made up by someone else as some prank?

"you would not have to paste it into a website" - Who's pasting what? What are you talking about?

204.225.215.56 (talk) 01:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

I left a reply to you and TEDickey on the talk page. LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 01:11, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

I gave a valid reason. I requested input on how to improve the passage. You keep refusing any kind of cooperative resolution. 204.225.215.56 (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

---