User talk:180 Degree Open Angedre
Welcome!
[edit]Hi 180 Degree Open Angedre! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 17:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've been trying out the editorial for a bit and it's been very helpful so far. I'll take a look into the other links here later. 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 18:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! 180 Degree Open Angedre,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
|
- Thanks, I'll go check it out! 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Independence of irrelevant alternatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Majority criterion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Center squeeze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electorate.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en
wikimedia.org).
Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.
Cabayi (talk) 10:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Cabayi
- I don't know if you already saw the email I sent to the Arb Committee earlier today, but if not, could you please let me know why I have been indefinitely blocked? I have very little clue what rule I may have broken, so I would like some clarification, please.
- Thanks 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 20:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- The Arbitration Committee received substantial evidence that you have engaged in significant off-wiki canvassing, which includes off-wiki coordination of disruptive editing, specifically in regard to voting reform and activism. Cabayi (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- What exactly is the evidence and if possible, where exactly would I be able to see it for myself? And if it's not against your protocols or anything, would I be able to find out who exactly sent in that evidence? If not, that's fine. I mainly want to know what I'm being accused of doing. @Cabayi
- Thanks again for your time 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 11:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- The block notice above tells you how to proceed. Cabayi (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Cabayi I would prefer to be as informed as possible of the reasoning behind my block before proceeding to request being unblocked. If it is against some policy to share the evidence that was used to determine my block, please just let me know, and I will proceed with the request. I just don't want to be defending myself completely blind. 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Private evidence received by the committee stays private. Cabayi (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thank you 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- Private evidence received by the committee stays private. Cabayi (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Cabayi I would prefer to be as informed as possible of the reasoning behind my block before proceeding to request being unblocked. If it is against some policy to share the evidence that was used to determine my block, please just let me know, and I will proceed with the request. I just don't want to be defending myself completely blind. 180 Degree Open Angedre (talk) 01:49, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
- The block notice above tells you how to proceed. Cabayi (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- The Arbitration Committee received substantial evidence that you have engaged in significant off-wiki canvassing, which includes off-wiki coordination of disruptive editing, specifically in regard to voting reform and activism. Cabayi (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)