User talk:1500mass

Welcome!

Hello, 1500mass!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Ned1a Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 02:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DeepSeek edits

Your recent editing history at DeepSeek shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You appear to be repeatedly editing the article to include mention of US sanctions on India regarding GPUs. If you want this to be included in the article, take it to the talk page for DeepSeek and wait for consensus. Truthnope (talk) 03:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

not in edit war, but restoring removal of destructive content by ips 1500mass (talk) 03:13, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Numerous non-IP users, including myself, have reverted your edits. If you disagree, that's fine, but you need to take it to the talk page. You cannot just unilaterally disregard numerous other editors on that page. Truthnope (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

if someone has disagreement , let them make a consensus in the talk. Then remove accordingly. One cannot remove without a consensus is reached 1500mass (talk) 03:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Only the ip users from US have disrupted the article by removing it 1500mass (talk) 03:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let us take this to the talk page. Truthnope (talk) 03:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

=

AfC notification: Draft:U.S. Sanctions on NVIDIA Chips for Countries has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:U.S. Sanctions on NVIDIA Chips for Countries. Thanks! Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 13:15, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Sanctions on NVIDIA Chips for Countries (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

Agree with comments and editor blocked as a sock.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:U.S. Sanctions on NVIDIA Chips for Countries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1500mass! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]