User:Schorensaw
 | Nearly all of the information on this user page is "fabricated." Do not use it as a trustworthy source of information, please. All of the sources, citations, and references on this page are made up. |
 | This user is of Arab ancestry. هذا المستخدم من أصل عربي |
Schorensaw or Arthur Mitchell Schorensaw is a documented Wikipedian explorer, aspirant and bibliophile of an Arab ethnicity. He is a scholar in the pursuit of knowledge, as well as a philosophy, philology, linguistics and natural sciences postgraduate.
| — Wikipedian ♂ — | |
| Name | Arthur Schorensaw |
|---|---|
| Born | August 1 |
| Pronouns | He/Him |
| Languages | Arabic, French, English |
| Ethnicity | Arab |
| Height | 172cm |
| Sexuality | Bisexual |
| IQ | Above 100 |
| Personality type | INTJ |
| Family and friends | |
| Boyfriend | Joseph |
| Pets | One mother cat and three kittens |
| Education and employment | |
| Education | Mathematics, Philosophy, Physics, Arabic, French, Islamic Education, S.V.T |
| Hobbies, interests, and beliefs | |
| Hobbies | Philosophy, Theology, Writing, Reading |
| Contact info | |
| Discord | schorensaw |
| scho.rensaw | |
| Account statistics | |
| Edit count | 3 |
He is a neophyte in philosophy and literacy. Additionally, Schorensaw is a trainee at Wikipedia and his intentions are "to make knowledge accessible to all people universally".
Schorensaw has many notable hypotheses concerning the field of philosophy. His theses explore epistemology, metaphysics and ethics, particularly notions such as "Theology Proper", "Empiricism", "Kantianism" and "Spinozism".
Theories
Ambox important.svg | Every claim in this section was intended to be a playful addition to this article. |
The contingency argument is a philosophical concept established by Arthur Schorensaw to support his claims concerning the thesis that morality is a creation of human emotions. To explicate it simply, Schorensaw believes that human morality is not an objective system of ethical principles but rather it occurs as an effect stemming from the empathetic and sympathetic nature of the psychological, biological, and social structure of a human being. Implying that morality, as a realistic concept, is nothing but an emotional occurrence characterized by different reactions and feelings.[1]
His contingency argument is the notion that morality is more of a contingency rather than a necessity in the universe. If there was a reality where humans didn't have emotions, morality would break. This argument is backed with the analogy of "The Psychopath Example.
- ^ Schorensaw, Arthur Mitchell (2014). The Critique of Pure Pureness: An Argument from Discordian Uchronia. New Alexandria: Metaphysica Press. p. 432.