Jump to content

User:EF5/Important WPW discussions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of WikiProject Weather-related discussions that editors can use to check consensus on a topic or browse around.

Link Issue Dates Summary
Tornado death toll officially revised downward Content May 5 - May 19, 2011 This relatively short discussion saw the invention of the table seen at the Enhanced Fujita scale article, still used today.
Bold titles in article leads for events without formal names Content April 12 - May 4, 2022 This discussion, never formally closed, was the first to address the AVOIDBOLD issue.
Who is more accurate for deaths: NCEI or TWC Content May 26 - June 1, 2023 This discussion attempted to address whether TWC or NCEI were more accurate for deaths, although it was never closed.
Proposal for new tornado chart Content June 27 - July 10, 2023 This discussion set in stone the new "list of tornadoes" format.
Proposal - Criteria for inclusion on Tornadoes of XXXX articles Notability March 10 - April 1, 2024 This discussion ratified what is acceptable on "Tornadoes of YYYY" articles and was partially amended again in December 2024.
Copyright of the famous 1997 "Dead Man Walking" image? Copyright May 11 - May 21, 2024 This discussion was the start of a massive purge of over 1,000 images on Wikimedia Commons.
New tornado articles and the news Notability October 4 - October 5, 2025 First discussion to properly address the notability of individual tornadoes.
Requested move 8 December 2024 Name December 7 - December 14, 2024 This RM set in stone that "tornado" should not be used twice in lists of tornadoes in a particular outbreak.
RfC: Criteria for individual tornado articles Notability December 16, 2024 - February 8, 2025 This RfC clarified the notability guidelines on articles for individual tornadoes and resulted in the creation of Wikipedia:Notability of individual tornadoes.
Split outbreak and flooding, duration? and WP:TOOSOON Notability March 10 - March 16, 2025 The first discussion unofficially concluded that IAR overlooks CRYSTAL, although the second discussion contradicted that. Further discussion probably needed.