User:Civilizededucation

:HELLO friends. Warm welcome. Please use my talk page to inform me about any posts that you may want me to see, just keep the issues where they belong. I try to be as clear and concise as possible on all issues, and am trying to familiarize myself with WP:CIVIL and other Wiki policies and guidelines. I also want to keep focus only on building a good encyclopedia.

The thing I have learned on Wikipedia is that your peace of mind is more important than....whatever. Take it easy..... and you can enjoy.

The electricity supply in my area is rather erratic. Please excuse if I unexpectedly disappear from some activities in which I am involved.

I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.

–Jimmy Wales ^[1]^[2]^[3]

Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

In Thought du Jour Harold Geneen has stated:^[4]

The reliability of the person giving you the facts is as important as the facts themselves. Keep in mind that facts are seldom facts, but what people think are facts, heavily tinged with assumptions.

Founding principles of Wikipedia

Picture of the day

Celeste is a 2018 platform game developed and published by the indie studio Maddy Makes Games. The player controls Madeline, a young woman with anxiety and depression who aims to climb Celeste Mountain. During her climb, she encounters several characters, including Badeline, a personification of her self-doubt who attempts to stop her from climbing the mountain. Development of Celeste began in August 2015, when game developers Maddy Thorson and Noel Berry participated in a game jam, where they created Celeste for the PICO-8. It was released as a full game on January 25, 2018, for Linux, macOS, the Nintendo Switch, the PlayStation 4, and Windows, before being released on the Xbox One the following day, and on Google Stadia in July 2020. This cover art for Celeste depicts, from left to right, the characters Badeline, Oshiro, Madeline, Granny, and Theo.Cover art credit: Maddy Makes Games

Archive – More featured pictures...

This user is a
curmudgeon

This user enjoys watching pointless animations.

Burrito ergo sum

I fart, therefore I am.

This user is male, and as such, he would prefer to be addressed and/or referred to with masculine pronouns.

Tip of the day

How to create a category

Let us say you have thought of a new category you want to place some articles in. To create this new category, go to one of the pages that you wish to put there, and add a category tag naming the new category to the end of the article, like this:

[[Category:Category name]]

...where in place of category name you type the actual name of the category. When you save the page, the category should appear on the bottom line of the page. If it is indeed a new category, it will turn up in red. But this does not mean there is no such category: it might exist but with a slight difference in naming. Before you create a new category, make sure it does not already exist. In a new browser window, click on Special pages in the toolbox menu on the left side of your screen. Then click on All pages. Pick Category from the Namespace dropdown menu, and then enter the name of the category. Look over the index for synonymous categories.

Once you are sure your new name is good to go: Click on the redlink, and then click on the article creation link provided in the instructions that appear on your screen.

You will need to put a parent category on the new page, and then save the page. Going forward you can put your newly named category at the bottom of pages that you wish to add your new category to. Categories with too few pages in them are usually nominated for deletion.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Link farm and other knick knack

User:Civilizededucation/test

User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox

User:Civilizededucation/Sandbox2

User:Civilizededucation/stuffbox

Wikipedia:Plagiarism

Tips

Wikipedia:Tip of the day/October 19, 2006

Wikipedia:Template messages

Wikipedia:Writing better articles

Help:Wikitable

User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo

egl

special:Tags

HOW TO CITE

Template:Citation/core

Deletion of articles

WP:HOWTO

article Talk page templates

Wikipedia:Cheatsheet

Wikipedia:How to edit a page

Wikipedia:Article development

Wikipedia:Manual of Style

Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Templates

Template:Tmbox

Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace

Wikipedia:Userboxes

help HTML

WP:Images

Wikipedia:Finding images tutorial

Wikipedia:List of free online resources

Wikipedia:Smurrayinchester's signature tutorial

[[Category:Wikipedia features]

Help:Contents/Site map

Wikipedia:Reliable sources and undue weight

Editing Help

To make a , [[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]]
Magnus's Make Ref
Icons Cheatsheet
All-in-one Editing Guide All-in-one Editing Guide
Un-indenting or Outdenting
Help:Wikipedia: The Missing Manual/Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles/Documenting Your Sources
Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons

Tick

npp

pp

akt

References

^ Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.
^ http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html
^ Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo
^ Harold Geneen in his "Thought du Jour", cited by Michael Kesterton in The Globe and Mail on February 20, 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of information.
^ "Manned Space Chronology: Apollo_11". spaceline.org. Retrieved 2008-02-06.
^ "Apollo Anniversary: Moon Landing "Inspired World"". nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[1] Jimmy Wales (2006-05-16). ""Zero information is preferred to misleading or false information"". WikiEN-l electronic mailing list archive. Retrieved 2006-06-11.

[2] ttp://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2006-May/046732.html

[3] Wales, Jimbo. "Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales jwales at wikia.com Mon Dec 6 18:35:38 UTC 2004". Retrieved 2011-02-22. Delirium wrote: Well, I'd expand the ban on "original research" slightly further than just that. An article that makes no new low-level claims, but nonethless synthesizes work in a non-standard way, is effectively original research that I think we ought not to publish. This comes up most often in history, where there is a tendency by some Wikipedians to produce novel narratives and historical interpretations with citation to primary sources to back up their interpretation of events. Even if their citations are accurate, Wikipedia's poorly equipped to judge whether their particular synthesis of the available information is a reasonable one. [Jimbo Wales writes] I agree completely. I think in part this is just a symptom of an unfortunate tendency of disrespect for history as a professional discipline. Some who completely understand why Wikipedia ought not create novel theories of physics by citing the results of experiments and so on and synthesizing them into something new, may fail to see how the same thing applies to history. --Jimbo

[long-4] Harold Geneen in his "Thought du Jour", cited by Michael Kesterton in The Globe and Mail on February 20, 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of information.

[5] "Manned Space Chronology: Apollo_11". spaceline.org. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[6] "Apollo Anniversary: Moon Landing "Inspired World"". nationalgeographic.com. Retrieved 2008-02-06.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]


9 August 2025
News and notes: Court order snips out part of Wikipedia article, editors debate whether to frame shreds or pulp them Plus a mysterious CheckUser incident, and the news with Wikinews. Discussion report: News from ANI, AN, RSN, BLPN, ELN, FTN, and NPOVN A review of June, July and August. Disinformation report: The article in the most languages Who is this guy? Community view: News from the Villages Pump Threads since June. In the media: Disgrace, dive bars, deceased despots, and diverse dispatches And slop. Crossword: Accidental typography It's not a conlang, it's a crossword puzzle. Comix: best-laid schemes o' wikis an' men gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy! Traffic report: I'm not the antichrist or the Superman Everybody's Somebody's Fool.
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives